A comparative study of the effectiveness and safety of injectable combination therapy of keloid and hypertrophic scars with 5-fluorouracil and betamethasone

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access


therapy for their reliable removal. Standard methods of treatment often give unpredictable results, are accompanied by various complications, and require the use of expensive equipment.

AIM: To investigate the efficacy and safety of intralesional injection of a combination of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and betamethasone for the treatment of keloids and hypertrophic scars.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study involved 26 patients who were divided into two equal groups. Patients in group A received intralesional injections of betamethasone, and those in group B received 5-FU and betamethasone. Three injections were performed with an interval of 3 weeks. The scars were assessed at the beginning of the treatment, on the 3rd and 6th week during the treatment, and 4 and 16 weeks after the end of the treatment. The dynamics of scar condition was evaluated by the average decrease in the scar height and density, changes in subjective sensations, and the presence or absence of complications.

RESULTS: At 4 weeks after the end of the therapy, the total effectiveness of reducing the initial scar height was significantly higher in group B (10 patients; 76.9%) than in group A (6; 46.1%). In the comparison of long-term results at 16 weeks after treatment, 92.3% of the patients from group B and 53.8% of the patients from group A showed cessation of scar growth, flattening and softening, diminished itching and pain, smoothing of the scar contour, and a decrease in the color of the border between the scar and surrounding tissues.

CONCLUSIONS: The combination of betamethasone with 5-FU is safer and more effective than monotherapy with betamethasone or 5-FU in the treatment of keloid and hypertrophic scars, with a faster and more pronounced decrease in the height and density of the scar, erythema, and subjective sensations. This mode of therapy is characterized by a low relapse rate with prolonged follow-up. The article is of interest to practicing cosmetologists, dermatologists, and plastic surgeons.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Evgeniya V. Ikonnikova

Central State Medical Academy General Management Department of the President of the Russian Federation; Institute of Plastic Surgery and Cosmetology

Author for correspondence.
Email: evikonnikova@bk.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8813-9132

Associate Professor of the Department of Dermatovenereology and Cosmetology

Russian Federation, Moscow; Moscow

Larisa S. Kruglova

Central State Medical Academy General Management Department of the President of the Russian Federation; Institute of Plastic Surgery and Cosmetology

Email: kruglovals@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5044-5265

MD, PhD, professor, Central State Medical Academy Management of Affairs of the President Russian Federation, Moscow

Russian Federation, Moscow; Moscow

Nataliya E. Manturova

Institute of Plastic Surgery and Cosmetology; Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University

Email: manturovane@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4281-1947

Head of the Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Cosmetology and Cell Technologies, N.I. Pirogova, Doctor of Medical Science

Russian Federation, Moscow; Moscow

Marina A. Petrii

Central State Medical Academy General Management Department of the President of the Russian Federation

Email: marina0301nikolaeva@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2559-1719
Russian Federation, Moscow


  1. Grishenkova LN, Gorbachev FA, Anishchenko SL, Kuzmichev VA, Savrasova NA, Merkulova EP. Fractures of the bones of the middle zone of the face: forensic medical examination. Minsk: Higher School; 2015. (in Russian)
  2. Bayat A, McGrouther DA, Ferguson MW. Skin scarring. Br Med J. 2003;326(7380):88-92. doi: 10.1136/bmj.326.7380.88
  3. Stenko AG, Talibova AM, Kruglova LS, Korchazhkina NB. The use of a conjugate of hyaluronidase for the prevention and treatment of cicatricial deformations. Kremlin Medicine Journal. Russian Journal. 2018;(1):114-9. (in Russian)
  4. Berman B, Maderal A, Raphael B. Keloids and hypertrophic scars: pathophysiology, classification, and treatment. Dermatol Surg. 2017;1:3-18. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000000819
  5. Maksimova NV, Lyundup AV, Lubimov RO, Melnichenko GA, Nikolenko VN. Pathophysiological aspects of wound healing in health and in diabetic foot. Annals of the Russian Academy of Medical Sciences. 2014;(11-12):110-7. (in Russian)
  6. Zhidkova YuYu, Penevskaya NA, Stepanova EF. Prerequisites for improving the pharmacoprophylaxis of hypertrophic and keloid scars. Scientific Statements of the Belgorod State University. Series: Medicine. Pharmacy. 2012:1-12. (in Russian)
  7. Schastlivtsev IV, Lobastov KV, Tsaplin SN, Mkrtychev DS. Modern view of the hemostasis system: cell theory. Medical Advice. Russian Journal. 2019;(16):72-7. doi: 10.21518/2079-701X-2019-16-72-77. (in Russian)
  8. Gauglitz GG, Korting HC, Pavicic T, Ruzicka T, Jeschke MG. Hypertrophic scarring and keloids: pathomechanisms and current and emerging treatment strategies. Mol Med. 2011;17(1-2):113-25. doi: 10.2119/molmed.2009.00153
  9. Lee HJ, Jang YJ. Recent understandings of biology, prophylaxis and treatment strategies for hypertrophic scars and keloids. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19(3):711. doi: 10.3390/ijms19030711
  10. Kruglova LS, Techieva SG, Stenko AG, Shmatova AA. Modern view of innovative methods of treatment of pathological cicatricial deformities. Clinical Dermatology and Venereology. Russian Journal. 2014;(5):105-17. (in Russian)
  11. Ozerskaya OS. Skin scars. Experimental and Clinical Dermatocosmetology. Russian Journal. 2004;(4):50-8. (in Russian)
  12. Podlyashuk EL, Head VP. Bucky therapy in dermatocosmetology. Radiology and Practice. Russian Journal. 2009;(4):26-30. (in Russian)
  13. Kurganskaya IG. Complex correction of pathological skin scars. Dis. St.Petersburg; 2011. (in Russian)
  14. Stepankina ES, Barmin EV, Stepankin SN, Trofimov EI. Causes and pathogenesis of the formation of pathological skin scars (literature review). Herald of Restorative Medicine. Russian Journal. 2017;(1):103-10. (in Russian)
  15. Bock O, Schmid-Ott G, Malewski P, Mrowietz U. Quality of life of patients with keloid and hypertrophic scarring. Arch Dermatol. 2006;297(10):433-8. doi: 10.1007/s00403-006-0651-7.
  16. Stenko AG, Shchukina ЕV, Shmatova AA, Shuginina OI, Zhukova OV, Techieva SG. Conservative treatment of patients with cicatricial changes in the skin by electrode pharmacophoresis. Russian Journal of Skin and Venereal Diseases. 2014;17(1):58-61. (in Russian)
  17. Ogawa R. Keloid and hypertrophic scars are the result of chronic inflammation in the reticular dermis. Int J Mol Sci. 2017;18(3):606. doi: 10.3390/ijms18030606
  18. Klyuchareva SV, Nechaeva OS, Kurgan IG. Pathological scars in the practice of a dermatocosmetologist: new possibilities of therapy with Egallohit (Galaderm). Bulletin of Aesthetic Medicine. Russian Journal. 2009;(2):41-9. (in Russian)
  19. Kozlov VA, Mushkovskaya SS, Konovalskaya SB. Keloid scars. Difficulties in diagnosis and treatment. Clinical Dentistry. Russian Journal. 2015;(1):28-30. (in Russian)
  20. Guller AE, Shekhter AB. Clinical type and histological structure of cutaneous scars as predictive factors of therapeutic outcome. Annals of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery. Russian Journal. 2007;(4):19-31. (in Russian)
  21. Atiyeh BS, Costagliola M, Hayek SN. Keloid or hypertrophic scar: the controversy: review of the literature. Ann Plastic Surg. 2005;54(6):676-80.
  22. Ozerskaya OS. Skin scars and their dermatocosmetological correction. St.Petersburg: Art of Russia; 2007:57-74. (in Russian)
  23. Baitinger VF, Paityan KG. Morphologic and functional characteristics of pathological skin scars: state of the art. Issues of Reconstructive and Plastic Surgery. Russian Journal. 2013;(1):28-34. (in Russian)
  24. Del Toro D, Dedhia R, Tollefson TT. Advances in scar management: prevention and management of hypertrophic scars and keloids. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016;24(4):322-9. doi: 10.1097/MOO.0000000000000268
  25. Zabnenkova OV. Clinical experience in the correction of hypertrophic, keloid and atrophic scars. Doctor. Russian Journal. 2007;(2):32-4. (in Russian)
  26. Felipe BR, Cleyton DS, Jayme AFJ. Update on hypertrophic scar treatment. Clinics. 2014;69(8):565-73. doi: 10.6061/clinics/2014(08)11.
  27. Rakhmatulina MR, Karamova AE, Saitburkhanov RR. Federal clinical guidelines for the management of patients with keloid and hypertrophic scars. Moscow: Russian Society of Dermatovenereologists and Cosmetologists; 2015. (in Russian)
  28. Arndt KA, ed. Correction of scars. Transl. from Engl. Moscow: Practical Medicine (Red Elsevier); 2009. (in Russian)
  29. Alster TS, Nanni CA. Pulsed dye laser treatment of hypertrophic burn scars. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 1998;102(6):2190-5.
  30. Tanzi EL, Alster TS. Laser treatment of scars. Skin Ther Lett. 2004;9(1):4-7.
  31. Har-Shai Y, Amar M, Sabo E. Intralesional cryotherapy for enhancing the involution of hypertrophic scars and keloids. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;111(6):1841-52.
  32. Karpova TN, Ponomarenko GN, Samtsov AV. Electroand ultraphonophoresis collagenase for correction of dermal scars. Bulleten of the Russian Military Medical Academy. 2009;(1):89-94. (in Russian)
  33. Gold MH, McGuire M, Mustoe TA, Pusic A, Sachdev M, Waibel J, Murcia C; International Advisory Panel on Scar Management. Updated international clinical recommendations on scar management: part 2 – algorithms for scar prevention and treatment. Dermatol Surg. 2014;40(8):825-31. doi: 10.1111/dsu.0000000000000050
  34. Vertieva EYu, Olisova OYu, Kochergin NG, Pinson IYa. Review of pathogenetic mechanisms and methods of scar correction. Russian Journal of Skin and Venereal Diseases. 2015;18(1):51-7. (in Russian)
  35. Sun P, Lu X, Zhang H, Hu Z. The efficacy of drug injection in the treatment of pathological scar: A network meta-analysis. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2019. doi: 10.1007/s00266-019-01570-8.
  36. Xu SJ, Teng JY, Xie J, Shen MQ, Chen DM. Comparison of the mechanisms of intralesional steroid, interferon or verapamil injection in the treatment of proliferative scars. Zhonghua Zheng Xing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2009;25(1):37-40.
  37. Voronkov AV, Stepanova EF, Zhidkova YuYu, Gamzeleva OYu. Modern approaches to pharmacological correction of pathological scars. Basic Research. Russian Journal. 2014;3(2):301-8. (in Russian)
  38. Berman B, Maderal A, Raphael B. Keloids and hypertrophic scars: pathophysiology, classification, and treatment. Dermatol Surg. 2017;43(Suppl 1):S3-18. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000000819
  39. Robles DT, Moore E, Draznin M, Berg D. Keloids: pathophysiology and management. Dermatol Online J. 2007;13(3):9.
  40. Nanda S, Reddy BS. Intralesional 5-fluorouracil as a treatment modality of keloids. Dermatol Surg. 2004;30(1):54-7.
  41. Liu W, Wu X, Gao Z, Song N. Remodelling of keloid tissue into normal-looking skin. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2008;61(12):1553-4.
  42. Blumenkranz M, Hernandez E, Ophir A, Norton EW. 5-fluorouracil: new applications in complicated retinal detachment for an established antimetabolite. Ophthalmology. 1984;91(2):122-30.
  43. Fitzpatrick RE. Treatment of inflamed hypertrophic scars using intralesional 5-FU. Dermatol Surg. 1999;25(3):224-32.
  44. Shah VV, Aldahan AS, Mlacker S, Alsaidan M, Samarkandy S, Nouri K. 5-Fluorouracil in the treatment of keloids and hypertrophic scars: a comprehensive review of the literature. Dermatol Ther. (Heidelb) 2016;6(2):169-83. doi: 10.1007/s13555-016-0118-5

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
1. Pic.1

Download (154KB)
2. Pic.2

Download (134KB)
3. Pic.3

Download (159KB)

Copyright (c) 2020 Eco-Vector

СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: 015912 от 28.03.1997 г
СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ЭЛ № ФС 77 - 80653 от 15.03.2021 г

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies