CLINICAL AND DERMOSCOPIC FEATURES OF ATYPICAL MELANOMA
- Authors: Saifullina V.A.1, Garanina O.E.1, Klemenova I.A.1, Uskova K.A.1, Mironycheva A.M.1, Saifullin A.P.1, Shlivko I.L.1
-
Affiliations:
- Privolzhsky Research Medical University
- Section: DERMATO-ONCOLOGY
- Submitted: 10.01.2025
- Accepted: 21.03.2025
- Published: 24.05.2025
- URL: https://rjsvd.com/1560-9588/article/view/645376
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/dv645376
- ID: 645376
Cite item
Full Text



Abstract
BACKGROUND: Melanoma is one of the most aggressive skin tumors, the incidence of which is increasing. Dermatoscopic diversity and imitation of other skin tumors lead to erroneous diagnoses and the choice of incorrect tactics.
AIMS: To identify clinical and dermatoscopic features depending on the thickness of atypical invasive melanoma that mimics other benign and malignant skin neoplasms.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was carried out at the Clinical and Diagnostic Department at the University Clinic of PRMU for the period from January 2018 to December 2022. A total of 3957 medical records of patients who applied to the center with skin neoplasms were analyzed, among them 270 cases of skin melanoma were identified, 57 of which had a clinical and pathomorphological discrepancy between the preliminary and final diagnosis (atypical), were further divided into subgroups by Breslow thickness - thin <0.8 mm (n = 37) and thick ≥0.8 mm (n = 20), for comparative analysis 70 melanomas were taken as a control group (typical).
RESULTS: Atypical thin melanomas were more common in young patients aged 40 versus 57 years (p=0.000) and were characterized by a smaller average diameter - 8 mm versus 10 mm (p=0.000). Clinically, cases of atypical thin melanoma differed in the following features: asymmetry 83.7% versus 100% (p=0.011), polychromy 70.1% versus 89.2% (p=0.043), smooth borders 27.1% versus 8.1% (p=0.032), cases of atypical thick melanoma differed in: asymmetry 71% versus 97.1% (p=0.004) and smooth borders 60% versus 14.7 (p=0.001). Dermoscopically, cases of atypical thin melanoma were characterized by the following features: polychromy 81.1% vs. 100% (p=0.005), atypical pigment network 67.6% vs. 94.6% (p=0.003), white streaks 16.3% vs. 40.5% (p=0.020), structureless area gray/gray-blue color 54.1% vs. 78.4% (p=0.027), punctate vessels 27.1% vs. 5.4% (p=0.012), glomerular vessels 13.5% vs. 0 (p=0.021); atypical thick melanoma cases differed in: atypical pigment network 25% vs. 79.4% (p=0.000), dots/globules at the periphery 15% vs. 41.2% (p=0.045), structureless area black/dark brown/brown 75% vs. 97.1% (p=0.013), structureless area gray/gray-blue 55% vs. 94.2% (p=0.001), structureless area red/pink 65% vs. 88.2% (p=0.041).
CONCLUSIONS: Statistically significant clinical and dermatoscopic features that are not characteristic of typical melanoma characterize atypical melanomas.
Keywords
Full Text

About the authors
Viktoria A. Saifullina
Privolzhsky Research Medical University
Author for correspondence.
Email: dr.saifullina@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1502-5505
SPIN-code: 5873-2280
Аспирант кафедры кожных и венерических болезней
Russian FederationOxana E. Garanina
Privolzhsky Research Medical University
Email: oksanachekalkina@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7326-7553
SPIN-code: 6758-5913
Cand. Sci. (Med.)
Russian Federation, Nizhny NovgorodIrina A. Klemenova
Privolzhsky Research Medical University
Email: iklemenova@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1042-8425
SPIN-code: 8119-2480
D. Sci. (Med.), Prof.
Russian Federation, Nizhny NovgorodKseniia A. Uskova
Privolzhsky Research Medical University
Email: k_balyasova@bk.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1000-9848
SPIN-code: 1408-3490
Assistant
Russian Federation, Nizhny NovgorodAnna M. Mironycheva
Privolzhsky Research Medical University
Email: mironychevann@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7535-3025
SPIN-code: 3431-7447
Assistant
Russian Federation, Nizhny NovgorodAleksandr P. Saifullin
Privolzhsky Research Medical University
Email: sayfullin-a.p@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0108-398X
SPIN-code: 5698-5841
Врач-нейрохирург
Irena L. Shlivko
Privolzhsky Research Medical University
Email: irshlivko@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7253-7091
D. Sci. (Med.), Assoc. Prof.
Russian Federation, Nizhny NovgorodReferences
- Okhovat, J.P., et al., The first 30 years of the American Academy of Dermatology skin cancer screening program: 1985-2014. J Am Acad Dermatol, 2018. 79(5): p. 884-891.e3.
- Coit, D.G., et al., Cutaneous Melanoma, Version 2.2019, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw, 2019. 17(4): p. 367-402.
- Mandalà, M. and D. Massi, Tissue prognostic biomarkers in primary cutaneous melanoma. Virchows Arch, 2014. 464(3): p. 265-81.
- Lallas, A., et al., Accuracy of Dermoscopic Criteria for the Diagnosis of Melanoma In Situ. JAMA Dermatol, 2018. 154(4): p. 414-419.
- Silva, V.P., et al., Dermoscopic features of thin melanomas: a comparative study of melanoma in situ and invasive melanomas smaller than or equal to 1mm. An Bras Dermatol, 2013. 88(5): p. 712-7.
- Balagula, Y., et al., The significance of crystalline/chrysalis structures in the diagnosis of melanocytic and nonmelanocytic lesions. J Am Acad Dermatol, 2012. 67(2): p. 194.e1-8.
- Lorentzen, H.F., K. Weismann, and F.G. Larsen, Dermatoscopic prediction of melanoma thickness using latent trait analysis and likelihood ratios. Acta Derm Venereol, 2001. 81(1): p. 38-41.
- Stante, M., et al., Non-invasive analysis of melanoma thickness by means of dermoscopy: a retrospective study. Melanoma Res, 2001. 11(2): p. 147-52.
- Argenziano, G., et al., Clinical and dermatoscopic criteria for the preoperative evaluation of cutaneous melanoma thickness. J Am Acad Dermatol, 1999. 40(1): p. 61-8.
- Carli, P., et al., Preoperative assessment of melanoma thickness by ABCD score of dermatoscopy. J Am Acad Dermatol, 2000. 43(3): p. 459-66.
- Hayashi, K., et al., High-frequency 30-MHz sonography in preoperative assessment of tumor thickness of primary melanoma: usefulness in determination of surgical margin and indication for sentinel lymph node biopsy. Int J Clin Oncol, 2009. 14(5): p. 426-30.
- Argenziano, G., et al., Epiluminescence microscopy: criteria of cutaneous melanoma progression. J Am Acad Dermatol, 1997. 37(1): p. 68-74.
- Guitera, P., et al., Melanoma histological Breslow thickness predicted by 75-MHz ultrasonography. Br J Dermatol, 2008. 159(2): p. 364-9.
- Tamai, I., et al., Molecular and functional characterization of organic cation/carnitine transporter family in mice. J Biol Chem, 2000. 275(51): p. 40064-72.
- Steding-Jessen, M., et al., Thin or early melanoma, risk factors and associated mortality. Dan Med J, 2022. 69(9).
- Reiter, O., et al., The differences in clinical and dermoscopic features between in situ and invasive nevus-associated melanomas and de novo melanomas. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol, 2021. 35(5): p. 1111-1118.
Supplementary files
