Email this article 
LATE-OROGENIC GRANITOIDS OF THE TERVU AGMATITIC ZONE IN THE SOUTHEASTERN PART OF THE SVECOFENNIAN BELT (THE NORTHERN LADOGA AREA, RUSSIA)
- Authors: Baltybaev S.K.1,2, Rizvanova N.G.1, Kuznetsov A.B.1, Petrakova M.E.1, Vivdich E.S.1
-
Affiliations:
- Institute of Precambrian Geology and Geochronology the Russian Academy of Sciences
- St. Petersburg State University
- Issue: Vol 511, No 2 (2023)
- Pages: 206-214
- Section: PETROLOGY
- Submitted: 30.01.2025
- Published: 01.08.2023
- URL: https://rjsvd.com/2686-7397/article/view/649852
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/S2686739723600546
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/WFHMDM
- ID: 649852
Cite item
Open Access
Access granted
Subscription Access
Abstract
The formation of breccia zones was taking place with the simultaneous healing of them by granitic materials at the final stages of the Late Proterozoic magmatic and metamorphic activity in the region 1.86 Ga ago. The Tervu breccia zone with granitic agmatites has a sublatitude orientation, which is discordant in relation to the early structures and Kurkieki enderbite and Lauvatsari-Impiniemi diorite-tonalite complexes in the Svecofennian rocks of the Ladoga region. There are the largest granitic bodies in this area – Tervu and Peltola intrusions located in the Tervu breccia zone. The U–Pb age of monazite from granites of the Peltola intrusion is determined as 1859 ± 4 Ma, and coincides with the age of the granites of the Tervu intrusion (1859 ± 3 Ma). This assumes that the granites of both intrusions and some surrounded smaller bodies were intruded simultaneously into the tectonically weakened space when plastic deformations turned to elastic-plasticity ones during at the late-orogenic stage. The results obtained reveal the features of the tectonic development of the joint zone of the two largest blocks of the Fennoscandinavian shield – the Karelian craton and the Svecofennian belt.
About the authors
S. K. Baltybaev
Institute of Precambrian Geology and Geochronology the Russian Academy of Sciences; St. Petersburg State University
Author for correspondence.
Email: shauket@mail.ru
Russian, St. Petersburg; Russian, St. Petersburg
N. G. Rizvanova
Institute of Precambrian Geology and Geochronology the Russian Academy of Sciences
Email: shauket@mail.ru
Russian, St. Petersburg
A. B. Kuznetsov
Institute of Precambrian Geology and Geochronology the Russian Academy of Sciences
Email: shauket@mail.ru
Russian, St. Petersburg
M. E. Petrakova
Institute of Precambrian Geology and Geochronology the Russian Academy of Sciences
Email: shauket@mail.ru
Russian, St. Petersburg
E. S. Vivdich
Institute of Precambrian Geology and Geochronology the Russian Academy of Sciences
Email: shauket@mail.ru
Russian, St. Petersburg
References
- Балтыбаев Ш.К., Глебовицкий В.А., Козырева И.В. и др. Геология и петрология свекофеннид Приладожья / СПб.: Изд-во СПбГУ, 2000. 198 с.
- Балтыбаев Ш.К., Вивдич Э.С. Эволюция Мейерской надвиговой зоны Северного Приладожья (Республика Карелия, Северо-Запад России): PT-условия формирования минеральных парагенезисов и геодинамические реконструкции // Геотектоника. 2021. Т. 225. № 4. С. 73–87. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0016853X21040032
- Балтыбаев Ш.К., Глебовицкий В.А., Козырева И.В., Шульдинер В.А. Мейерский надвиг – структура сочленения Карельского кратона и Свекофеннского пояса в Приладожье // ДАН. 1996. Т. 348. № 3. С. 353–356.
- Балтыбаев Ш.К., Левченков О.А., Бережная Н.Г., Левский Л.К., Макеев А.Ф., Яковлева С.З. Время и длительность свекофеннской плутоно-метаморфической активности на юго-востоке Балтийского щита (Приладожье) // Петрология. 2004. Т. 12. № 4. С. 374–393.
- Holland T.J.B. Powel R. An internally-consistent thermodynamic dataset for phases of petrological interest // J. Metamorphic Geol. 1998. V. 16. P. 309–344. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1314.1998.00140.x
- Ладожская протерозойская структура (геология, глубинное строение и минерагения) / Отв. ред. Н.В. Шаров. Петрозаводск: КарНЦ РАН, 2020. 435 с.
- Middlemost E.A.K. Naming materials in the magma/igneous rock system // Earth-Science Reviews. 1994. V. 37. P. 215–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/0012-8252(94)90029-9
- Frost B.R., Barnes C.G., Collins W.J., Arculus R.J., Ellis D.J., Frost C.D. A geochemical classification for granitic rocks // Journal of Petrology. 2001. V. 42. P. 2033–2048. https://doi.org/10.1093/petrology/42.11.2033
- Laurent O., Martin H., Moyen J.F., Doucelance R. The diversity and evolution of late-Archean granitoids: evidence for the onset of “modern-style” plate tectonics between 3.0 and 2.5 Ga // Lithos. 2014. V. 205. P. 208–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lithos.2014.06.012
- Котов А.Б., Саморукова Л.М. Эволюция гранитообразования в тектоно-метаморфических циклах раннего докембрия (по данным структурно-петрологических и термобарохимических исследований). Ленинград: Наука, 1990. 59 с.
- Балтыбаев Ш.К., Левченков О.А., Глебовицкий В.А. и др. Оценка времени региональной постмигматитовой калишпатизации по данным U-Pb датирования монацита (Метаморфический комплекс Северного Приладожья, Россия) // ДАН. 2010. Т. 410. № 4. С. 529–532.
- Шульдинер В.И., Балтыбаев Ш.К., Козырева И.В. Эволюция условий метаморфизма гранатсодержащих гранулитов Западного Приладожья // Петрология. 1997. Т. 5. № 3. С. 253–277.
- Murphy J., Keppie J., Nance R. Fault reactivation within Avalonia: Plate margin to continental interior deformation // Tectonophysics. 1999. V. 305. P. 183–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-1951(99)00017-7
- Pe-Piper G., Koukouvelas I., Piper D.J.W. Synkinematic granite emplacement in a shear zone: The Pleasant Hills pluton, Canadian Appalachians // GSA Bulletin. 1998. V. 110. № 4. P. 523–536. https://doi.org/10.1130/0016-7606(1998)110<0523:SGEIAS>2.3.CO;2
- Neves S.P., Vauchez A. Magma emplacement and shear zone nucleation and development in northeast Brazil (Fazenda Nova and Pernambuco shear zones; State of Pernambuco) // Journal of South American Earth Sciences. 1995. V. 8. № 3–4. P. 289–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-9811(95)00014-7
- Neves S.P., Mariano G., Beltrao B.A., Correia P.D. Emplacement and deformation of the Cachoeirinha pluton (Borborema province, NE Brazil) inferred through petrostructural studies: Constraints on regional strain fields // Journal of South American Earth Sciences. 2005. V. 19. P. 127–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JSAMES.2005.04.004
- Nironen M., Bateman R. Petrogenesis and syntectonic emplacement in the early Proterozoic of south-central Finland: a reversely zoned diorite-granodioritc and a granite // Geologische Rundschau. 1989. V. 78. P. 617–631. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01776194
- Саранчина Г.М. Гранитоидный магматизм, метаморфизм и метасоматоз докембрия (на примере Приладожья и других областей). / Ленинград: Изд-во Ленингр. ун-та, 1972. 127 с.
- Седова И.С., Саморукова Л.М., Глебовицкий В.А., Крылов Д.П. Геохимия гранитоидов Свекофеннского тектонометаморфического цикла Северного Приладожья // Петрология. 2004. Т. 12. № 4. С. 394–414.
- Kurhila M., Mänttäri I., Vaasjoki M., Rämö O.T., Nironen M. U–Pb geochronology of the late Svecofennian Leucogranites of Southern Finland // Precambrian Research. 2011. V. 190. № 1. P. 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2011.07.008
Supplementary files
