Measurements of Electrodynamics Parameters of a Cylindrical RF-Cavity with Stainless Steel Samples

M. V. Lalayan; Лалаян М. В.; Yu. Yu. Lozeev; Лозеев Ю. Ю.; A. I. Makarov; Макаров А. И.; S. M. Polozov; Полозов С. М.

doi:10.31857/S1028096023070087

Measurements of Electrodynamics Parameters of a Cylindrical RF-Cavity with Stainless Steel Samples

Authors: Lalayan M.V.¹, Lozeev Y.Y.¹, Makarov A.I.¹, Polozov S.M.¹
Affiliations:
1. National Research Nuclear University “MEPhI”
Issue: No 7 (2023)
Pages: 47-51
Section: Articles
URL: https://rjsvd.com/1028-0960/article/view/664535
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/S1028096023070087
EDN: https://elibrary.ru/TDRSGR
ID: 664535

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access
Restricted Access

Access granted
Restricted Access

Subscription Access

Abstract
About the authors
References
Supplementary files
Statistics

Abstract

Stainless steel with galvanic copper coating is often used as a material for ion linear accelerators RF cavities. However, for the cavities with complex inner surfaces obtaining a uniform copper coating becomes technologically challenging. The solution might be found in manufacturing the cavity without copper coating at all, though in that case the amount of power losses in the cavity should be carefully estimated. To make such estimations the experiment was carried out, where the electrodynamic properties of a test cavity with two coupling loops were measured with the stainless steel samples placed inside it. The results of this experiment showed sufficient difference between the simulated and measured Q-factor values for the same 12Х18Н10Т sample steel grade. Thus, an assumption was made the magnetic properties of austenitic steel samples could have changed during the manufacturing process, so the magnetic permeability values for the steel samples were estimated.

Keywords

Ion accelerator, RF-cavity, radio-frequency quadrupole, Q-factor, magnetic permeability, austenitic stainless steel, RF-losses, copper galvanic plating, network analyzer, power gain.

References

Собенин Н.П., Милованов О.С. Техника сверхвысоких частот. М.: Энергоатомиздат, 2007. 545 с.
А. с. 265 312 (СССР). Линейный ускоритель ионов / ОИПТЗ. Владимирский В.В., Капчинский И.М., Тепляков В.А. // Б.И. 1970. № 10. С. 75.
Koshelev V. et al. // Proc. of LINAC2016, East Lansing, MI, USA, 2016. P. 575.
Butenko A.V., Bazanov A.M., Donets D.E. et al. Commissioning of New Light Ion RFQ Linac and First Nuclotron Run with New Injector // Proc. of RuPAC2016. St. Petersburg, Russia, 2016. P. 153. https://www.doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-RuPAC2016-FRCAMH02
Kuzmichev V.G., Kozlov A.V., Kulevoypresenter T. et al. The RF Power System for RFQ-injector of Linac-20 // Proc. of RuPAC2016. St. Petersburg. 2016. P. 297. https://www.doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-RuPAC2016-TUPSA038
Hasegawa K., Mizumoto M., Ito N. et al. // J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. 1997. V. 34. № 7. P. 622. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/18811248.1997.9733720
Lu L., Ma W., Zhai Y.H. et al. High Power Test of the LEAF-RFQ // Proc. of LINAC2018. Beijing, 2018. P. 808. https://www.doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-LINAC2018-THPO052
Belyaev O.K., Ershov O.V., Maltsev I.G. et al. IHEP Experience on Creation and Operation of RFQS // Proc. of LINAC2000. Monterey, 2000. P. 1. https://www.doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.physics/0008020
Bartz U., Schempp A. A CW RFQ prototype. // Proc. of IPAC2011. San Sebatian. Spain, 2011. P. 2559.
Morishita T., Kondo Y., Hasegawa K. et al. Vane Machining by the Ball-end-Mill for the New RFQ in the J-Parc LINAC // Proc. of LINAC2010. Tsukuba. Japan, 2010. P. 521.
Ostroumov P.N., Barcikowski A., Clifft B. et al. High Power Test of a 57-MHz CW RFQ // Proc. of LINAC2006. Knoxville, Tennesse USA, 2006. P. 767.
Koubek B., Grudiev A., Timmins M. // Phys. Rev. Accelerators Beams. 2017. V. 20. № 8. P. 1. https://www.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevAccelBeams. 20.080102
Zhao B., Chen Sh., Zhu T. et al. // Nucl. Engineer. Technol. 2019. V. 51. № 2. P. 556. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2018.10.003
Снежной Г.В., Мищенко В.Г., Снежной В.Л. // Новые материалы и технологии в металлургии и машиностроении. 2014. № 2. С. 9.
Cao B., Iwamoto T., Bhattacharjee P.P. // Mater. Sci. Engineer. A. 2020. V. 774 P. 11. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2020.138927
Mumtaz K. et al. // J. Mater. Sci. 2004. V. 39 P. 85. https://www.doi.org/10.1023/B:JMSC.0000007731. 38154.e1
Manjanna J. et al. // J. Mater. Sci. 2008. V. 43. P. 2659. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/s10853-008-2494-4
Lebedev A.A., Kosarchuk V.V. // Int. J. Plasticity. 2000. V. 16. № 7–8. P. 749. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/S0749-6419(99)00085-6
Rocha M., Oliveira C. // Mater. Sci. Engineer. A. 2009. V. 517. № 1–2. P. 281. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2009.04.004
Das A., Tarafder S. // Int. J. Plasticity. 2009. V. 25. № 11. P. 2222. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2009.03.003