Variation and inheritance of an atypical form of the anterior lobe of the M1 of Lemmus trimucronatus chrysogaster (Rodentia, Arvicolinae)

Capa

Citar

Texto integral

Resumo

Using material from laboratory colonies, it was established that the variability of deviations from the typical shape (tf) of the anterior lobe M1 in lemmings of the genus Lemmus forms a bilateral morphological module, designated as atypical shape (AF). Three morphotypes of AF have been identified, differing in degree of complexity. The main component of modular variability is an increase in the frequency of individuals with the AF phenotype and the degree of expressiveness of this phenotype with age. Segregation in the offspring into AF and tf individuals in various crossing options does not contradict the hypothesis of monogenic inheritance of these variations. Individuals with the tf phenotype are recessive homozygotes. Sometimes among them there may be undetected heterozygotes. Which phenotype (tf or AF) a heterozygote exhibits may depend on the litter number and (or) on the influence of modifier genes. Dominant homozygotes are considered nonviable.

Texto integral

Acesso é fechado

Sobre autores

M. Cheprakov

Institute of Plant and Animal Ecology, Russian Academy of Sciences

Autor responsável pela correspondência
Email: Cheprakov@ipae.uran.ru
Rússia, Yekaterinburg, 620144

Bibliografia

  1. Агаджанян А. К. Мелкие млекопитающие плиоцен–плейстоцена Русской равнины. М.: Наука, 2009. 676 с.
  2. Бородин А. В. Определитель зубов полевок Урала и Западной Сибири (поздний плейстоцен–современность). Екатеринбург: УрО РАН, 2009. 100 с.
  3. Гершензон С. М. Генетический полиморфизм в популяциях животных и его эволюционное значение // Журн. общ. биол.1974. Т. 35. № 5. С.678–684.
  4. Громов И. М., Поляков И. Я. Фауна СССР. Млекопитающие. Т. 3. Вып. 8. Л.: Наука, 1977. 502 с.
  5. Чепраков М. И. Фенотипическая изменчивость и наследование нетипичной формы anterior lobe M1 копытных леммингов (Dicrostonyx, Rodentia, Arvicolinae). Изв. РАН. Сер. биол. 2022. № 5. С. 482–488. doi: 10.31857/S1026347022050055.
  6. Чепраков М. И. Дополнительные элементы в задней части первого и второго верхних моляров у Lasiopodomys (Stenocranius) gregalis (Rodentia; Cricetidae) Изв. РАН. Сер. биол. 2023. № 6. С. 640–649. doi: 10.31857/S1026347022600996
  7. Abramson N., Dokuchaev N., Petrova T. Long-standing taxonomic and nomenclature issue of Lemmus obensis chrysogaster Allen, 1903 (Rodentia, Cricetidae) resolved. Mammalia. 2018. V. 82. P. 167–172. https://doi.org/10.1515/mammalia-2016-0081
  8. Abramson N. I., Petrova T. V. Genetic analysis of type material of the Amur lemming resolves nomenclature issues and creates challenges for the taxonomy of true lemmings (Lemmus, Rodentia: Cricetidae) in the eastern Palearctic. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 2018. V. 82. № 2. P. 465–477. https://doi.org/10.1093/zoolinnean/zlx044
  9. Abramson N., Petrova T., Dokuchaev N. Analysis of “historical” DNA of museum samples resolve taxonomic, nomenclature and biogeography issues: Сase study of true lemmings. Bio. Comm. 2022. V. 67. № 4. P. 340–348. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu03.2022.408
  10. Barbiere F., Rone, C., Ortiz P. E., Martin R. A., Pardiña U. F. A new nomenclatural system for the study of sigmodontine rodent molars: first step towards an integrative phylogeny of fossil and living cricetids. Biol. J. Lin. Soc. 2019. V. 127. P. 224–244. https://doi.org/10.1093/biolinnean/blz021
  11. Fedorov V., Goropashnaya A., Jarrell G. H., Fredga K. Phylogeographic structure and mitochondrial DNA variation in true lemmings (Lemmus) from the Eurasian Arctic. Biol. J. Lin. Soc. 1999. V. 66. P. 357–371. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.1999.tb01896.x
  12. Fedorov V. B., Goropashnaya A. V., Jaarola M., Cook J. A. Phylogeography of lemmings (Lemmus): No evidence for postglacial colonization of Arctic from the Beringian refugium. Molec. Ecol. 2003. V. 12. P. 725–731. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-294X.2003.01776.x
  13. Fejfar O., Heinrich W. D., Kordos L., Maul L. C. Microtoid cricetids and the early history of arvicolids (Mammalia, Rodentia). Palaeontologia electronica. 2011. V. 14. № 3. P. 1–38.
  14. Jentzsch M. Zur Variabilität der Molarenmuster einer Population von Erdmäusen Microtus agrestis (L., 1761) aus dem Norden Sachsen-Anhalts (Mammalia: Rodentia: Arvicolidae) // Zool. Abh. Staatl. Mus. Tierk. Dresden. 2006. V. 55. P. 191–198.
  15. Hulsey C. D., Cohen K. E., Johanson Z. et. al. Grand challenges in comparative tooth biology // Integrative and comparative biology. 2020. V. 60. № 3. P. 563–580. https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/icaa038
  16. Esteve-Altava B. In search of morphological modules: A systematic review // Biol. Rev. 2017a. V. 92. № 3. P. 1332–1347. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12284
  17. Esteve-Altava B. Challenges in identifying and interpreting organizational modules in morphology // J. Morphol. 2017b. V. 278. № 7. P. 960–974. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmor.20690
  18. Kapischke H. Zur Variabilität der Zähne von Feldmäusen Microtus arvalis (Pallas, 1779) aus Sachsen (Übersichtzueiner Sammlung im Rahmen des Projektes: Atlas der Säugetiere Sachsens). Veröff. Mus. Westlausitz Kamenz, 2014. V. 32. P. 85–110.
  19. Klingenberg C. P. Studying morphological integration and modularity at multiple levels: Concepts and analysis // Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B. 2014. V. 369. № 1649. P. 20130249. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2013.0249
  20. Kryštufek B., Shenbrot G. Voles and Lemmings (Arvicolinae) of the Palaearctic Region. Maribor: Sloven. Research Agency. 2022. 449 p.
  21. Marangoni P., Charles C., Tafforeau P. et al. Phenotypic and evolutionary implications of modulating the ERK-MAPK cascade using the dentition as a model // Sci. report. 2015. V. 5. № 1. P. 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep11658
  22. Markova E., Smirnov N. Phenotypic diversity arising from a limited number of founders: A study of dental variation in laboratory colonies of collared lemmings, Dicrostonyx (Rodentia: Arvicolinae) // Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 2018. V. 125. P. 777–793. https://doi.org/10.1093/biolinnean/bly172
  23. Markova E., Borodin A., Rakitin S. et al. The effects of population bottlenecks on dental phenotype in extant arvicoline rodents: Implications for studies of the quaternary fossil record // Quat. Sci. Rev. 2020. V. 228. P. 106045. DOI: 10.10.1016/j.quascirev.2019.106045.
  24. Miller G. S. The genera and subgenera of voles and lemmings // North Amer. Fauna. 1896. № 12. p. 1– 84.
  25. Reig O. A. A proposed unified nomenclature for the enamelled components of the molar teeth of the Cricetidae (Rodentia) // J. Zool. 1977. V. 181. № 2. P. 227–241.
  26. Spitsyn V. M., Bolotov I. N., Kondakov A. V. et al. A new Norwegian Lemming subspecies from Novaya Zemlya, Arctic Russia. Ecol. Mont. 2021.V. 40. P. 93–117. https://dx.doi.org/10.37828/em.2021.40.8.

Arquivos suplementares

Arquivos suplementares
Ação
1. JATS XML
Baixar
2. Fig. 1. Morphotypic variability of the anterior lobe (highlighted by a rectangle) of M1 in brown lemmings. 1 – variant of the typical form of the anterior lobe of M1; 2.1–2.3 – variants of the atypical form of the anterior lobe of M1, differing in the degree of expression of the additional reentrant angle on the anterior surface of the anterior lobe of M1: 2.1 – weakly expressed, 2.2 – average degree of expression, 2.3 – the greatest degree of expression.

Baixar (235KB)
Metadados

Declaração de direitos autorais © Russian Academy of Sciences, 2025