Gluon Anomaly and the Violation of the Zweig Rule

Capa

Citar

Texto integral

Acesso aberto Acesso aberto
Acesso é fechado Acesso está concedido
Acesso é fechado Somente assinantes

Resumo

It is well known that the gluon anomaly is responsible for the mass of the U(1) Goldstone boson. It is also manifested in the properties of pseudo-Goldstone states: the gluon anomaly in the next order of the 1/Nc expansion induces interactions violating the Zweig rule. A necessary condition for this is the explicit breaking of the chiral symmetry by the masses of light quarks. One of the physical consequences is that the η–η' mixing does not affect the 
 amplitude. Another consequence is the suppression of the first 1/Nc correction to the η–η' mixing angle. The mechanism of such suppression is discussed in detail. The conclusions are based on the 1/Nc expansion and the effective meson Lagrangian of the Nambu–Jona-Lasinio model and are compared with the results of the 1/Nc chiral perturbation theory.

Sobre autores

A. Osipov

Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, 141980, Dubna, Moscow region, Russia

Autor responsável pela correspondência
Email: aaosipov@jinr.ru

Bibliografia

  1. S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. D 11, 3583 (1975).
  2. G. 't Hooft, Nucl. Phys. B 72, 461 (1974).
  3. E. Witten, Nucl. Phys. B 160, 57 (1979).
  4. H. Leutwyler, Phys. Lett. B 374, 163 (1996).
  5. H. Leutwyler, Phys. Lett. B 374, 181 (1996).
  6. R. Kaiser and H. Leutwyler, Eur. Phys. J. C 17, 623 (2000).
  7. P. Herrera-Sikl'ody, J. I. Latorre, P. Pascual, and J. Taron, Nucl. Phys. B 497, 345 (1997).
  8. A.A Osipov, JETP Lett. 115(6), 30 (2022).
  9. A.A. Osipov, JETP Lett. 115, 371 (2022).
  10. A.A. Osipov, arXiv:hep-ph/2302.14118 (2023).
  11. A.A. Osipov, arXiv:hep-ph/2303.01865 (2023).
  12. Y. Nambu and G. Jona-Lasinio, Phys. Rev. 122, 345 (1961).
  13. Y. Nambu and G. Jona-Lasinio, Phys. Rev. 124, 246 (1961).
  14. M.K. Volkov, ЭЧАЯ 17, 432 (1986).
  15. D. Ebert and H. Reinhardt, Nucl. Phys. B 271, 188 (1986).
  16. A.A. Osipov, JETP Lett. 113(6), 413 (2021).
  17. A.A. Osipov, Phys. Lett. B 817, 136300 (2021).
  18. A.A. Osipov, Phys. Rev. D 104(10), 105019 (2021).
  19. G. Veneziano, Nucl. Phys. B 159, 213 (1979).
  20. C. Rosenzweig, J. Schechter, and G. Trahern, Phys. Rev. D 21, 3388 (1980).
  21. P. Di Vecchia and G. Veneziano, Nucl. Phys. B 171, 253 (1980).
  22. P. Di Vecchia, F. Nicodemi, R. Pettorino, and G. Veneziano, Nucl. Phys. B 181, 318 (1981).
  23. G. Cvetic, Ann. Physics 255, 165 (1997).
  24. A. Manohar and H. Georgi, Nucl. Phys. B 234, 189 (1984).
  25. H. Leutwyler, Nucl. Phys. B (Proc. Suppl.) 64, 223 (1998).
  26. J. L. Goity, A.M. Bernstein, and B.R. Holstein, Phys. Rev. D 66, 076014 (2002).
  27. D. J. Gross, S.B. Treiman, and F. Wilczek, Phys. Rev. D 19, 2188 (1979).
  28. P. Kroll, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 20, 2667 (2005).

Arquivos suplementares

Arquivos suplementares
Ação
1. JATS XML

Declaração de direitos autorais © Российская академия наук, 2023