Historical and psychological aspect of studying the phenomenon of scientific heritage

封面

如何引用文章

全文:

开放存取 开放存取
受限制的访问 ##reader.subscriptionAccessGranted##
受限制的访问 订阅存取

详细

This article attempts to analyze the problem of studying the phenomenon of scientific heritage and continuity in the history of psychology. Interpretation of scientific heritage is one of the complex tasks that necessitate professional discussion among historians of psychology. The importance of discussing the question of the criteria of scientific tradition, defining the correlation of the concepts of “tradition”, “heritage”, “continuity”, studying the conditions of emergence and preservation of scientific tradition in the history of psychology is emphasized. The importance of systematic scientific development of the model of tradition research in Russian psychology is emphasized. It is concluded that the study of this problem is essential for the development of the methodology of the history of psychology not only from the position of comprehension of the phenomenon of “scientific traditions” as a subject of research, but also from the position of inspiration of the scientific community to solve significant methodological issues.

全文:

受限制的访问

作者简介

O. Klypa

Petrozavodsk State University

编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: ovk61@mail.ru

PhD (Psychology), Professor of the Department of Pedagogy and Psychology of Childhood, Institute of Pedagogy and Psychology

俄罗斯联邦, 185035, Petrozavodsk, Lenin Avenue, 33

参考

  1. Bahtin M.M. K filosofskim osnovam gumanitarnyh nauk. Avtor i geroj: K filosofskim osnovam gumanitarnyh nauk. Saint-Petersburg: Izd-vo “Azbuka”, 2000. (In Russian)
  2. Zhuravlev A.L., Kostrigin A.A. Naukometricheskij podhod v psihologii. Nauchnye podhody v sovremennoj otechestvennoj psihologii. Moscow: Izd-vo “Institut psihologii RAN”, 2023. P. 440–458. (In Russian)
  3. Olejnik Ju.N., Zhuravlev A.L. Metodologicheskie osnovanija izuchenija personalij v istorii psihologii na osnove ih publikacionnoj aktivnosti. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal. 2024. V. 45. № 6. P. 44–53. (In Russian)
  4. Zhuravlev A.L., Harlamenkova N.E., Sergienko E.A., Vetrova I.I. Vmesto predislovija. Preemstvennost’ pokolenij v razrabotke aktual’nyh problem psihologii. Psihologicheskie issledovanija. Moscow: Institut psihologii RAN, 2020. P. 7–19. (In Russian)
  5. Eliseeva I.N., Olejnik Ju.N. Naukometricheskij analiz kak metod izuchenija sostojanija i dinamiki nauchnogo napravlenija (na primere ispol’zovanija kategorii “individual’nost’” v nazvanijah dissertacionnyh issledovanij 1992–2018 gg.). Metodologija, teorija, istorija psihologii lichnosti. Eds. A.L. Zhuravlev, E.A. Nikitina, N.E. Harlamenkova. Moscow: Izd-vo “Institut psihologii RAN”, 2019. P. 218–233. (In Russian)
  6. Istorija otechestvennoj i mirovoj psihologicheskoj mysli: znat’ proshloe, analizirovat’ nastojashhee, prognozirovat’ budushhee: materialy mezhdunarodnoj konferencii po istorii psihologii, Moskva, 01–03 ijunja 2021 g. Eds. A.L. Zhuravlev, Ju.V. Kovaleva, Ju.N. Olejnik. Mosscow: Izd-vo “Institut psihologii RAN”, 2023. 887 p. (In Russian)
  7. Istorija, sovremennost’ i perspektivy razvitija psihologii v sisteme Rossijskoj akademii nauk: Materialy Mezhdunarodnoj jubilejnoj nauchnoj konferencii, posvjashhennoj 50-letiju sozdanija Instituta psihologii RAN, Moskva, 16–18 nojabrja 2022 goda. Eds. D.V. Ushakov, A.L. Zhuravlev, A.V. Mahnach, N.E. Harlamenkova, A.V. Jurevich, I.I. Vetrova. Moscow: Institut psihologii RAN, 2022. (In Russian)
  8. Kant I. Ideja vseobshhej istorii vo vsemirno-grazhdanskom plane, 1784. Soch. in 6 vv. Moscow: Izd-vo “Mysl’”, 1966. V. 6. P. 6–23. (In Russian)
  9. Kol’cova V.A. Istorija psihologii: Problemy metodologii. Moscow: Izd-vo “Institut psihologii RAN”, 2008. (In Russian)
  10. Kondakov I.V. Arhitektonika kul’turnogo nasledija. Kul’turogenez i kul’turnoe nasledie. Saint-Petersburg, 2014. (In Russian)
  11. Morgun A.N. Naukometricheskoe prostranstvo issledovanij po istorii psihologii: prirosty i izderzhki. Znanie. Ponimanie. Umenie. 2019. № 2. P. 136–146. (In Russian)
  12. Morgun A.N., Olejnik Ju.N., Zhuravlev A.L. Tematicheskie napravlenija otechestvennoj istorii psihologii kak vnutrennie faktory razvitija otrasli: naukometricheskij analiz na materiale RINC. Institut psihologii Rossijskoj akademii nauk. Social’naja i jekonomicheskaja psihologija. 2021. V. 6. № 1(21). P. 219–251. (In Russian)
  13. Olejnik Ju.N., Eliseeva I.N. Teoretiko-metodologicheskie i metodicheskie osnovanija naukometricheskih issledovanij v istorii psihologii (na primere razrabotki problem individual'nosti v otechestvennoj psihologii v 1992–2018 gg.). Psihologija lichnosti: metodologija, teorija, praktika (Metodologija, teorija i istorija psihologii): Sbornik statej. Moscow: Institut psihologii RAN, 2024. P. 199–204. (In Russian)
  14. Olejnik Ju.N., Zhuravlev A.L. Nauchnye tradicii kak mehanizm preemstvennosti psihologicheskogo poznanija. Chast’ 1. Sostojanie i trudnosti izuchenija. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal. 2024. V. 45. № 3. P. 5–14. (In Russian)
  15. Olejnik Ju.N., Zhuravlev A.L. Nauchnye tradicii kak mehanizm preemstvennosti psihologicheskogo poznanija. Chast’ 2. Problemy, podhody i perspektivy issledovanija. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal. 2024. V. 45. № 4. P. 5–15. (In Russian)
  16. Piskoppel’ A.A. Kul’tura. Tradicii. Nasledie. Moscow: Izd-vo: “Nasledie MMK”, 2017. (In Russian)
  17. Razvitie rossijskoj psihologii nakanune i posle russkoj revoljucii 1917 goda: tendencii, nauchnye shkoly, personalii: Sbornik statej uchastnikov Vserossijskoj nauchnoj konferencii s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem, Arzamas, 19–21 sentjabrja 2019 goda. Eds. A.L. Zhuravlev, Ju.N. Olejnik, Je.V. Tihonova. Arzamas: Obshhestvo s ogranichennoj otvetstvennost’ju “Interkontakt”. 2019. (In Russian)
  18. Rubanov V.G. Filosofskoe osmyslenie nauchnoj preemstvennosti. Izvestija Tomskogo politehnicheskogo universiteta. 2009. V. 315. № 6. P.70–74. (In Russian)

补充文件

附件文件
动作
1. JATS XML
下载

版权所有 © Russian Academy of Sciences, 2025