Digital Euro Within the Categories of International Political Economy

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Over 100 countries around the world are discussing and implementing projects to introduce central bank digital currencies (CBDCs). In November 2023, the European Central Bank launched a two-year preparation phase for the potential issuance of a digital euro. Having a vast experience in constructing interbank trans-border settlement systems, now it has to design and implement an infrastructure for retail trans-border payments. European officials regard the digital euro as an important geopolitical instrument since it is expected to play a crucial role in strengthening the strategic autonomy of the European Union. This article aims to detect and evaluate preconditions that are essential for the implementation of the project and are likely to shape its overall outcome. Analysis is based on the principles of International Political Economy (IPE). It proceeds from the assumption that the global economic system has a hierarchical structure which sets limits for any specific actor's decisions and hamper resorting to universal solutions. The results suggest that in the move to a digital euro the EU (and the ECB in particular) face greater challenges than China, Russia and other major countries that plan to issue CBDCs. First, after decades of functioning of the Single European Market and the EMU, a deep fragmentation of retail payment systems across the euro area do persist. Second, euro area countries demonstrate sharp differences in the development of transborder digital commerce, e.g., in international trade in digitally-deliverable services. Therefore, their interests within negotiations on the future digital euro may not coincide that is likely to encumber the progress towards the European CBDC, as it happened with the European Payments Initiative launched in 2020. The geopolitical profile of a move to a digital euro includes two unfavorable for the EU components: the project is being implemented under strong external pressure and it aims to preserve rather than enrich accomplishments of European integration. When in 1999 the EU introduced the single currency, it set proactive goals – to make the euro an important international currency and to promote stabilization of the international monetary system. Now, 25 years later, the EU employs reactive goal setting – it strives to prevent dollarization of domestic payments that is looming over the euro area due to the infrastructural dominance of foreign payment services. However, without the single currency, the EU would have been left without any tools to oppose this type of external pressure.

About the authors

O. V Butorina

Institute of Europe of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: olgabutorina@instituteofeurope.ru
Corresponding Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences; Doctor of Sciences (Economics), Deputy Director for Research Moscow, Russia

References

  1. Белов В.Б. (2023) Промышленность ЕС в условиях цифровой трансформации европейского хозяйственно-политического пространства. Европа в глобальной пересборке. Под ред. Ал.А. Громыко. Весь Мир, Москва. С. 339–354.
  2. Буторина О.В. (2023) Евросоюз в мировом хозяйстве: факторы глобализации и деглобализации. Европа в глобальной пересборке. Под ред. Ал.А. Громыко. Весь Мир, Москва. С. 294–311.
  3. Головнин М.Ю. (2022) Мировая финансовая система: глобальные тренды и качественные изменения. Научные труды Вольного экономического общества России. Т. 235. № 3. С. 95–104. doi: 10.38197/2072-2060-2022-235-3-95-104
  4. Городнова Н.В. (2023) Анализ специфики и перспектив применения цифровой валюты центральных банков. Вопросы инновационной экономики. Т. 13. № 3. С. 1573–1590. doi: 10.18334/vinec.13.3.117168
  5. Изотов В.С. (2024) Интеграционные системы и проблемы политической стабильности в ХХI веке. Внешняя политика России в XXI веке: региональное измерение и интеграционные приоритеты. Под ред. Л.Э. Слуцкого. МГУ им. М.В. Ломоносова, Москва. С. 89‒120.
  6. Кочергин Д.А. (2021) Современные модели систем цифровых валют центральных банков. Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Экономика. Т. 37. № 2. С. 205–240. doi: 10.21638/spbu05.2021.202
  7. Маслов А.В., Швандар К.В. (2023) Новые международные проекты по использованию цифровых валют центральных банков в трансформации трансграничных расчетов. Финансовый журнал. Т. 15. № 2. С. 47–58. doi: 10.31107/2075-1990-2023-2-47-58
  8. Минакир П.А. (2022) Мировая экономика: идеальный шторм. Пространственная экономика. Т. 18. № 2. С. 7–37. doi: 10.14530/se.2022.2.007-037
  9. Нестеров И.О. (2023) Цифровые валюты центральных банков: инновационный инструмент для более эффективных внутренних и международных расчетов. Вестник СанктПетербургского университета. Экономика. Т. 39. № 1. С. 33–54. doi: 10.21638/spbu05.2023.102
  10. Сахаров Д.М. (2022) Конкуренция резервных валют в условиях полицентрического развития мировой финансовой системы. Финансы: теория и практика. Т. 26. № 1. С. 6–23. doi: 10.26794/2587-5671-2022-26-1-6-23
  11. Синельникова-Мурылева Е.В. (2020) Цифровые валюты центральных банков: потенциальные риски и выгоды. Вопросы экономики. № 4. С. 147–159. doi: 10.32609/0042-87362020-4-147-159
  12. Ahnert T., Assenmacher K., Hoffmann P., Leonello A., Monnet C., Porcellacchia D. (2024) The economics of central bank digital currency. International Journal of Central Banking. Vol. 20. No. 4. P. 221–274.
  13. Auer R., Cornelli G., Frost J. (2023) Rise of the Central Bank Digital Currencies. International Journal of Central Banking. Vol. 21. No. 4. P. 185–214.
  14. Auer S., Branzoli N., Ferrero G., Ilari A., Palazzo F., Rainone E. (2024) CBDC and the Banking System. Journal of Economics and Statistics. Vol. 245. Issue 4–5. P. 435–478. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jbnst-2024-0006
  15. Baeriswyl R., Reynard S., Swoboda A. (2024) Retail CBDC purposes and risk transfers to the central bank. Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics. Vol. 160. No. 7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41937-024-00124-3
  16. Bindseil U., Senner R. (2024) Macroeconomic modelling of CBDC: a critical review. ECB Working paper. No. 2978. 47 p.
  17. Bitter L. (2024) Banking Crises Under a Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC). Journal of Economics and Statistics. Vol. 245. Issue 4–5. P. 479–526. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jbnst2023-0107
  18. Cohen B. (2017) The IPE of money revisited. Review of International Political Economy. Vol. 24. Issue. 4. P. 657‒680. doi: 10.1080/09692290.2016.1259119
  19. Dong M., Xiaolin Xiao S. (2024) Idle Liquidity, CBDC and Banking. European Economic Review. Vol. 164. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2024.104700
  20. Fernández-Villaverde J., Schilling L., Uhlig H. (2024) Central Bank Digital Currency: when price and bank stability collide. ECB Working paper. No. 2888. 55 p.
  21. Germain R. (2025) Modern IPE: Lessons from a Counter-History. The Oxford Handbook of International Political Economy. Ed by J.C.W. Pevehouse, L. Seabrooke. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK. P. 17–33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198793519.013.37
  22. Gilpin R. (2001) Global Political Economy. Understanding the International Economic Order. Princeton University Press, Princeton, UK; Oxford, UK. 423 p.
  23. Herr H., Nettekoven Z. (2022). Currency hierarchy and underdevelopment. European Journal of Economics and Economic Policies. Vol. 19(2). P. 238–259. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/ejeep.2022.02.06
  24. Lane P. (2025) The digital euro: maintaining the autonomy of the monetary system. SUERF Policy Note. No. 369. 18 p.
  25. Monnet E. (2025) Cryptomercantilism: Donald Tramp’s monetary doctrine. SUERF Policy Brief. No. 1139. 6 p.
  26. Muñoz M.A., Soons O. (2023) Public money as a store of value, heterogeneous beliefs, and banks: implications of CBDC. ECB Working paper. No. 2801. 43 p.
  27. Nocciola L., Zamora-Pérez A. (2024) Transactional demand for central bank digital currency. ECB Working paper. No. 2926. 73 p.
  28. Quaglia L., Verdun A. (2024) The Geoeconomics of the Single Market for Financial Services. Journal of Common Market Studies. Vol. 62. No. 4. P. 1046–1062. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13595
  29. Westermeier С. (2024) The digital euro: a materialization of (in)security. Review of International Political Economy. Vol. 31. No. 2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2024.2345613

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2025 Russian Academy of Sciences