Geoeconomic Turn: Policy Priorities of the Next EU Commission

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

The next institutional cycle of the EU begins in a period of unprecedented uncertainty in the global economy and large-scale problems in the European economic space. The author explores possible economic and political directions in the activities of the new composition of the European Commission. A hypothesis is that the main priority will be to ensure the competitiveness of the European space, the development of new regulatory documents of a geo-economic nature and their implementation. An assessment of the genesis of the new economic and political stage with an analysis of the main regulatory decisions is presented. The article also focuses on economic initiatives for 2023-early 2024 to ensure economic security and antisubsidy regulation. These decisions are very significant as they form a drift from the “geopolitical” to the “geo-economic” role of the Commission. Further, the priorities of the economic policy of the new European Commission are consisted of three components: ensuring raw material security, maximising the competitiveness of the EU, protecting the adopted climate goals with partnership with the widest possible range of countries. The analysis demonstrated a significant weakening of the EU's position in the world economy, associated with a lag in productivity. The author concludes that the main risks of the “geoeconomic turn” are in the political sphere. Its actors may not be able to overcome numerous obstacles to implement the new industrial course, associated with the need to take into account the heterogeneous impact of various industries on the EU economy. The approaches of the article can be valuiable for studying other countries and regions in which economic policy integrates the search for efficiency in responses to external challenges.

About the authors

A. V Kotov

Institute of Europe, RAS

Email: alexandr-kotov@yandex.ru
Candidate of Sciences (Economics) Moscow, Russia

References

  1. Бажан А.И. (отв. ред.) (2023) Новые явления в экономике Европы. Институт Европы РАН, Москва. 198 с. doi: 10.15211/report72023_404
  2. Bazhan A.I. (ed.) (2023) Novye javlenija v jekonomike Evropy [New phenomena in the economy of Europe], IE RAS, Moscow, Russia. doi: 10.15211/report72023_404 (In Russian).
  3. Белов В.Б., Котов А.В. (2023) Экономические связи ЕС и России в условиях ограничительных мер. Общественные науки и современность. № 2. С. 72‒89. doi: 10.31857/S0869049923020053
  4. Belov V.B., Kotov A.V. (2023) Jekonomicheskie svjazi ES i Rossii v uslovijah ogranichitel'nyh mer [EU-Russia economic relations in conditions of restrictions], Social Sciences and Contemporary World, 2, pp. 72‒89. doi: 10.31857/S0869049923020053 (In Russian).
  5. Буторина О.В. (2022) Интеграция vs дезинтеграции: что сильнее? Мир перемен. № 3. С. 22‒40. doi: 10.51905/2073-3038_2022_3_22
  6. Butorina O.V. (2022) Integracija vs dezintegracii: chto sil'nee? [Integration vs. Disintegration: Which is Stronger?], The World of Change, 3, pp. 22‒40. doi: 10.51905/2073-3038_2022_3_22 (In Russian).
  7. Громыко Ал.А. (отв. ред.) (2023) Европа в глобальной пересборке. Институт Европы РАН; «Весь Мир», Москва. 508 с.
  8. Gromyko Al.A. (ed.) (2023) Evropa v global'noj peresborke [Europe in global reassembly], IE RAS; Ves Mir Publishing House, Moscow, Russia. (In Russian).
  9. Ершов М.В., Танасова А.С. (2022) Новые проблемы в мире: нарастание неопределенности. Современная Европа. № 7(114). С. 120‒134. doi: 10.31857/S0201708322070105
  10. Ershov M.V., Tanasova A.S. (2022) Novye problemy v mire: narastanie neopredelennosti [New Problems in the World Make Uncertainty Higher], Contemporary Europe, 7(114), pp. 120‒134. doi: 10.31857/S0201708322070105 (In Russian).
  11. Кондратьев В.Б. (2022) Роль критически важных сырьевых материалов в условиях экономической неопределенности: опыт ЕС. Горная промышленность. № 4. С. 94‒102. doi: 10.30686/1609-9192-2022-4-94-102.
  12. Kondratiev V.B. (2022) Rol' kriticheski vazhnyh syr'evyh materialov v uslovijah jekonomicheskoj neo-predelennosti: opyt ES [The role of critical raw materials in conditions of economic uncertainty: the EU experience], Russian Mining Industry, 4, 94–102. doi: 10.30686/1609-9192-2022-4-94-102 (In Russian).
  13. Кондратьева Н.Б. (2020) Европейская модель интеграции рынков. Становление и перспектива. РАН, Москва. 384 с.
  14. Kondratieva N.B. (2020) Evropejskaja model' integracii rynkov. Stanovlenie i perspektiva [The European model of market integration. Formation and prospects], Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia. (In Russian).
  15. Хесин Е.С. (2020). Экономика Европейского союза: итоги посткризисного десятилетия. Мировая экономика и международные отношения. Т. 64. № 1. С. 73‒81. doi: 10.20542/0131-2227-2020-64-1-73-81
  16. Khesin E.S. (2020) Jekonomika Evropejskogo sojuza: itogi postkrizisnogo desjatiletija [Economy of the European Union: A Decade after the Crisis], World economy and international relations, 64(1), pp. 73‒81. doi: 10.20542/0131-2227-2020-64-1-73-81 (In Russian).
  17. Шумилин А.И. (2019) Евросоюз готовится к «геополитическому рывку». Научно-аналитический вестник Института Европы РАН. № 6(12). С. 4‒11. doi: 10.15211/vestnikieran62019410
  18. Shumilin A.I. (2019). Evrosojuz gotovitsja k “geopoliticheskomu ryvku” [The EU is preparing for a geopolitical breakthrough], Nauchno-analiticheskij vestnik IE RAN, 6(12), pp. 4‒11. doi: 10.15211/vestnikieran62019410 (In Russian).
  19. Bown Ch. P. (2024). Trade Policy, Industrial Policy, and the Economic Security of the European Union. Peterson Institute for International Economics Working Paper. No. 24-2. 44 p. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4834530
  20. Broeders D., Cristiano F., Kaminska M. (2023) In Search of Digital Sovereignty and Strategic Autono-my: Normative Power Europe to the Test of Its Geopolitical Ambitions. Journal of common market studies. Vol. 61. Issue 5. P. 1261‒1280. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13462
  21. Bulfone F. (2023). Industrial policy and comparative political economy: A literature review and research agenda. Competition & Change. Vol. 27(1). P. 22–43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/10245294221076225
  22. Buti M., Fabbrini S. (2023) Next generation EU and the future of economic governance: towards a para-digm change or just a big one-off? Journal of European Public Policy. Vol. 30. Issue 4. P. 676‒695. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2022.2141303
  23. Haroche P. (2023) A “Geopolitical Commission”: Supranationalism Meets Global Power Competition. Journal of common market studies. Vol. 61. Issue 4. P. 970‒987. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13440
  24. Kübek G., Mancini I. (2024) EU Trade Policy between Constitutional Openness and Strategic Autonomy. European Constitutional Law Review. Vol. 19(3). P. 518–547. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1574019623000226
  25. Seidl T., Schmitz L. (2024) Moving on to not fall behind? Technological sovereignty and the ‘geo-dirigiste’ turn in EU industrial policy. Journal of European Public Policy. Vol. 31. Issue 8. P. 2147‒2174. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2023.2248204
  26. Teixeira J.E., Tavares-Lehmann A.T.C.P. (2022) Industry 4.0 in the European union: Policies and national strategies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. Vol. 180. 121664. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121664

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2024 Russian Academy of Sciences