THE TRANSFORMATION OF CHINA’S IMAGE IN EUROPEAN EXPERT DISCOURSE

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

The article examines how the European expert community perceives China and how this perception has changed from 2003 to 2023, using the classic image theory approach of Richard Herrmann and Michel Fischerkeller. The main objective of this study is to trace how the transformations in the image of China were affected by the evolution of Sino-European relations and to what extent these transformations influenced EU policy toward China. Given the significant role that the epistemic community plays in shaping policy in Europe, both at the national and EU levels, the focus is made on expert positions. The study applies qualitative content analysis of policy papers from seven of the most reputed European think tanks, covering the period of 2003–2023 (a total of 187 documents). Relying on the five ideal-typical images of the “Other” (enemy, ally, degenerate, empire and colony), the paper contributes to the theoretical framework by introducing a new ideal-typical image – a rival – to better describe the nature of EU-China relations and European experts’ perception of China. The conclusion is made that the image of China has shifted from that of an ally with degenerate elements to that of a rival with significant enemy elements. Key periods and turning points in the evolution of China’s image are identified and the linkage between this image and the official EU policy toward China is revealed.

About the authors

N. Yu KAVESHNIKOV

Moscow State Institute of International Relations of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MGIMO University); Institute of Europe, Russian Academy of Sciences

Author for correspondence.
Email: nikandrrr@mail.ru
Candidate of Sciences (Politics) Head of Department of Integration Studies; Leading Researcher Moscow, Russia

A. I LUPALTSOVA

Moscow State Institute of International Relations of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MGIMO University)

Email: a.i.lupaltsova@my.mgimo.ru
Lecturer Moscow, Russia

References

  1. Bates G., Wacker G. (2005) China’s Rise: Diverging U.S.–EU Perceptions and Approaches, SWP, Ber-lin. URL: https://www.swp-berlin.org/publications/products/projekt_papiere/ChinaGMF_end_ks.pdf (ac-cessed: 31.05.2024).
  2. Blockmans S. (2021) Lithuania, China and EU lawfare to counter economic coercion. CEPS, Brussels. URL: https://cdn.ceps.eu/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/PI2021-20_Lithuania-China-and-EU-lawfare.pdf (ac-cessed: 31.05.2024).
  3. Borges de Castro R. (2022) The war in Ukraine: China walking amid the shrapnel, EPC, Brussels. URL: https://epc.eu/en/Publications/The-war-in-Ukraine-China-walking-amid-the-shrapnel~466d4c (accessed: 03.06.2024).
  4. Boulding K. (1959) National Images and International Systems, The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 3(2), pp. 120–131. https://doi.org/10.1177/002200275900300204
  5. Butorina O.V. (2023) Torgovlya Evrosoyuza s Kitaem: problema deficita [The EU trade with China: deficiency problem], Sovremennaya Evropa, 7(121), pp. 5–20. https://doi.org/10.31857/S020170832307001X (In Russian).
  6. Chang-Liao N.C. (2023) The limits of strategic partnerships: Implications for China’s role in the Russia-Ukraine war, Contemporary Security Policy, 44(2), pp. 226–247. https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2023.2174702
  7. Cottam R. (1977) Foreign Policy Motivation: A General Theory and a Case Study. University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh, USA. 374 p.
  8. Cvetanovska D. (2020) Soft power context of Chinese investments to the European Union: challenges vs. opportunities, Journal of Liberty and International Affairs, 6(2), pp. 89–100. https://doi.org/10.47305/JLIA2020089c%20
  9. Danilin I.V., Kvashin Yu.D., Kislitsin S.V., Kobrinskaya I.Ya., Lomanov A.V., Utkin S.V. (2022) Evrosoyuz-Kitaj v menyayushchemsya miroustrojstve [European Union – China in the changing world composition], Mirovaya Ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 1(1), pp. 68–79. https://doi.org/ 10.20542/0131-2227-2022-66-1-68-79 (In Russian).
  10. Erdemir E. (2023) EU-China relations in an evolving multipolar international system: a comparative analysis of neo-classical realism and neo-realism, Marmara journal of European studies, 31(2), pp. 221‒241. https://doi.org/10.29228/mjes.449
  11. Gaenssmantel F. (2023) China-EU economic relations–new perspectives on decision-making, mutual understanding and effects—introduction to the special issue, Asia Europe Journal, 21(2), pp. 401–412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10308-023-00674-w
  12. Gemueva K.A., Salitskiy A.I., Semenova N.K. (2018) Evropejskie diskussii o kitajskoj iniciative «Odin poyas – odin put'» [European discussions on Chinese “One belt – one road” initiative], Vostochnaya analitika, 3(1), pp. 36‒42. (In Russian).
  13. Godement F. (2017) Hamburg G 20: A test for the China-EU-US triangle. ECFR, Berlin. URL: https://ecfr.eu/article/commentary_hamburg_g_20_a_test_for_the_china_eu_us_triangl/ (accessed: 01.06.2024).
  14. Godement F., Parello-Plesner J., Richard A. (2011) The scramble for Europe, ECFR Policy Brief, Berlin. URL: https://ecfr.eu/wp-content/uploads/ECFR37_Scramble_For_Europe_AW_v4.pdf (accessed: 03.06.2024).
  15. Grant C. (2008) Europe must build a strategic alliance with China. CER, London. URL: https://www.cer.eu/in-the-press/europe-must-build-strategic-alliance-china (accessed: 01.06.2024).
  16. Grant C., Barysch K. (2008) Can Europe and China shape a new world order, CER, London. URL: https://www.cer.eu/sites/default/files/publications/attachments/pdf/2011/p_837-611.pdf (accessed: 01.06.2024).
  17. Heiduk F. (2014) Conflicting Images? Germany and the Rise of China, German Politics, 23(1–2), pp. 118–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644008.2014.916693
  18. Herrmann R., Fischerkeller M. (1995) Beyond the enemy image and spiral model: Cognitive–strategic research after the cold war, International Organization, 49(3), pp. 415‒450. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300033336
  19. Holsti O. (1962) The Belief System and National Images: A Case Study, The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 6(3), pp. 244–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/002200276200600306
  20. Huotari M., Weidenfel J. (2020) Introduction: Pursuing a principles-first approach in EU China policy, in: M. Huotari, J. Weidenfel, C. Wessling (eds.) Towards a "principles-first approach" in Europe’s China policy, MERICS, Berlin, pp. 8‒18. URL: https://merics.org/sites/default/files/2021-03/Merics%20Papers%20on%20China%20EU-China%20final%201.pdf (accessed: 01.06.2024).
  21. Istomin I.A., Zhdanova Yu.D. (2017) Reakciya ES na ekonomicheskoe vozvyshenie KNR [EU reaction on China’s economic rising], Vestnik MGIMO-Universiteta, 5(56), pp. 91-113. https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2017-5-56-91-113 (In Russian).
  22. Ivannikov N.S., Shmonova U.A. (2023) The Role of Think Tanks in Shaping European Policies, Russia in the Global World, 26(2), pp. 33–47. https://doi.org/10.48612/rg/RGW.26.2.3
  23. Kartikasari A. (2019) Indonesia’s Image from China’s Perspective on South China Sea Dispute (A Preliminary Study on China’s Perception on Indonesia), Global: Jurnal Politik Internasional, 21(2), pp. 176‒197. https://doi.org/10.7454/global.v21i2.404
  24. Kashin V., Zaitsev A., (2021) Kitajskij uspeh v borbe za Evropu [China’s success in a bid for Europe], Rossiya v global’noj politike. URL: https://globalaffairs.ru/articles/kitajskij-uspeh-v-borbe-za-evropu/ (ac-cessed: 06.06.2024). (In Russian).
  25. Kilduff G.J., Elfenbein H.A., Staw B.M. (2010) The psychology of rivalry: A relationally dependent analysis of competition, Academy of Management Journal, 53(5), pp. 943–969. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2010.54533171
  26. Korski D. (2010) The soft power of hard states, ECFR, Berlin. URL: https://ecfr.eu/article/commentary_korskisoftpowerhardstates/ (accessed: 05.06.2024).
  27. Leal-Arcas R. (2022) Challenges and Opportunities in the EU-China Trade Relations in: Y.C. Kim (ed.) China and the Belt and Road Initiative. Understanding China. Springer, Cham, Switzerland, pp. 33‒54. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86122-3_3
  28. Leonard M. (2006) A new European approach to China, CER, London. URL: https://www.cer.eu/publications/archive/bulletin-article/2006/new-european-approach-china (accessed: 31.05.2024).
  29. Leonard M. (2010) How to deal with a more assertive China, CER, London. URL: https://ecfr.eu/article/commentary_how_to_deal_with_a_more_assertive_china_mark_leonard/ (accessed: 31.05.2024).
  30. Lomanov A.V. (2019) Otnosheniya Kitaya i ES: mezhdu sotrudnichestvom i sopernichestvom [China-EU relations: between cooperation and competition], Kitaj v mirovoj i regional'noj politike. Istoriya i sovremennost', 24(1), pp. 158‒172. https://doi.org/10.24411/2618-6888-2019-10009 (In Russian).
  31. Mikheev V.V., Lukonin S.A. (2024) “Kitajskie Gorki” [“Chinese Coaster”], Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 1(68), pp. 19‒30. https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2024-68-1-19-30 (In Russian).
  32. Mišík M. (2014) Our New Allies? The Perception of the New Member States of the EU by the Old Members, Czech Journal of Political Science, 3, pp. 234‒251. https://doi.org/10.5817/PC2014-3-234
  33. Nosov M. (2018) ES i Kitaj: torgovlya ili strategiya [EU and China: trade or strategy], Sovremennaya Evropa, 6(1), pp. 5‒17. http://dx.doi.org/10.15211/soveurope620180517 (In Russian).
  34. Ohara B. (2021) How China is undermining digital trust – and how democracies can respond, ECFR, Berlin. URL: https://ecfr.eu/article/how-china-is-undermining-digital-trust-and-how-democracies-can-respond/ (accessed: 02.06.2024).
  35. Özkeçeci-Taner B. (2012) From Allies to Frenemies and Inconvenient Partners: Image Theory and Turk-ish-Israeli Relations, Perceptions, 17(3), pp. 105‒129.
  36. Samoylov N.A. (2019) The Evolution of Russia’s Image in China in the early 20th century: Key Factors and Research Methodology, Vestnik SPbGU. Vostokovedenie i afrikanistika, 11(1), pp. 28‒39. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu13.2019.102
  37. Samoylov N.A. (2020) Visual Images of the Soviet Union and the West in China (1950–1960), in: G. Müller, N. Samoylov (eds.) Chinese Perceptions of Russia and the West, CrossAsia-eBooks, Heidelberg, pp. 365‒388.
  38. Samoylov N.A., Mayatskiy D.I. (2020) Images of Europeans in the Chinese Woodblock Book Huangqing zhigongtu, Vestnik SPbGU. Istoriya, 65(4), рp. 1259‒1271. https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu02.2020.415
  39. Schweisgut H.D. (2021) The European Union: Caught Between the United States and China, Politique Étrangère, 86(3), pp. 1‒13.
  40. Tsvyk A.V. (2019) “Odin poyas, odin put'”: vzglyad iz Evropy [The “Belt and Road” Initiative: A View from Europe], Sovremennaya Evropa, 1(86), pp. 104‒112. https://doi.org/10.15211/soveurope12019104112 (In Russian).
  41. Vinogradov A.O., Lushchik M.O. (2017) K istorii formirovaniya otnoshenij KNR-ES [The history of formation of China-EU relations], Kitaj v mirovoj i regional'noj politike. Istoriya i sovremennost', 22(22), pp. 352‒358. https://doi.org/10.24411/9785-0324-2017-00023 (In Russian).
  42. Weaver R.K. (1989) The Changing World of Think Tanks, PS: Political Science & Politics, 22(3), pp. 563‒578. https://doi.org/10.2307/419623
  43. Xin C. (2017) China-EU Economic and Trade Relations in: H. Zhou (ed) China-EU Relations. Research Series on the Chinese Dream and China’s Development Path. Springer, Singapore, pp. 69‒91. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1145-0_3
  44. Yin W. (2018) Challenges, issues in China-EU investment agreement and the implication on China’s domestic reform, Asia Pacific Law Review, 26(2), pp. 170–202. https://doi.org/10.1080/10192557.2019.1576347

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

Copyright (c) 2024 Russian Academy of Sciences