Features of social protection by implementing the right to disconnect
- Authors: Kolesov D.I.1
-
Affiliations:
- Institute of Europe RAS
- Issue: No 5 (119) (2023)
- Pages: 119-132
- Section: Articles
- URL: https://rjsvd.com/0201-7083/article/view/652213
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/S0201708323050108
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/YAGLZL
- ID: 652213
Cite item
Abstract
The article examines the realisation of the right to disconnect in the framework of workers’ social protection. The study explores different approaches to the definition of a new right. The right to disconnect is analysed on the basis of targeting and universality of social protection, soft and hard measures, the components of the new right, which include workers’ opportunity, employers’ responsibility, communication between employers and workers, protection from adverse consequences. The legal acts that serve as a foundation of the right to disconnect create a separate work pattern of teleworkers, which affects the formation of the targeting approach to social protection. The regulation of the right to disconnect introduced in European Social Partner framework agreement on digitalisation and European Parliament resolution of 21 January 2021 with recommendations to the Commission on the right to disconnect gives a more universal approach. The Resolution acknowledges the right to disconnect as a fundamental right and proposes hard regulatory and technological measures to ensure observation of work and rest periods. The agreement is based on the change in corporate culture. It is revealed that nowadays the right to disconnect serves as the only project aimed at regulating digital working relations in the framework of social protection of remote workers, however R2D can be limited by a narrow category of teleworkers. Debates over the right to disconnect touch upon the issue of the effectiveness of social dialogue in the context of adaptation to digital work organisation, as well as the possibility of keeping binary understanding of work and rest periods.
About the authors
Denis Ivanovich Kolesov
Institute of Europe RAS
Email: deniskolesov@gmail.com
Moscow, Russia
References
- Борко Ю.А., Биссон Л.С. (2019) Европейская интеграция: перезапуск идеи "Социальной Европы". Современная Европа. № 6. С. 5-17. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15211/soveurope620190517
- Маяцкий М. (2015) Освобождение от труда, безусловное пособие и глупая воля. Философско-литературный журнал "Логос". Т. 25. № 3(105). С. 72-87.
- Офман Е.М. (2021) Цифровая организация труда: прорыв в постиндустриальное общество? Вестник ЮУрГУ. Серия "Право". Т. 21. № 3. С. 24-29. doi: 10.14529/law210304
- Паяль А. (2015). Фабрика досуга: производство в цифровой век. Философско-литературный журнал "Логос". Т. 25. № 3(105). С. 88-119.
- Рогалева Г.А., Рогалева И.Ю. (2017) Анализ концептуальных положений о дифференциации в правовом регулировании труда. Вестник Университета имени О.Е. Кутафина (МГЮА). № 10. С. 84-89. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17803/2311-5998.2017.38.10.084-089/11430
- Урри Дж. (2012) Социология за пределами обществ: виды мобильности для XXI столетия. Изд. Дом Высшей школы экономики, Москва. 336 с.
- Chesalina O. (2021) The Legal Nature and the Place of the Right to Disconnect in European and in Russian Labour Law.Russian Law Journal. Vol. 9. Issue 3. P. 36-59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17589/2309-8678-2021-9-3-36-59
- Custers B. (2022) New digital rights: Imagining additional fundamental rights for the digital era.Computer Law & Security Review. Vol. 44. 105636. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2021.105636
- Dagnino E. (2020) "Working Anytime, Anywhere" and Working Time Provisions. Insights from the Italian Regulation of Smart Working and the Right to Disconnect. E-Journal of International and Comparative Labour Studies. Vol. 9. No. 3. P. 1-19.
- Devereux S. (2021) Targeting. Handbook on Social Protection Systems. Ed. by E. Schu?ring, M. Loewe. Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, Cheltenham, UK. P. 150-162. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781839109119.00027
- Eurofound (2021) Right to disconnect: Exploring company practices. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, Luxembourg. 61 p. doi: 10.2806/748556
- Eurofound, ILO (2017) Working anytime, anywhere: The effects on the world of work. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, Luxembourg, the International Labour Office, Geneva, Switzerland. 72 p. doi: 10.2806/372726
- Glowacka M. (2020) A little less autonomy? The future of working time flexibility and its limits. European Labour Law Journal. Vol. 12(2). P. 113-133. doi: 10.1177/2031952520922246
- Gschwind L., Vargas O. (2019) Telework and its effects in Europe. Telework in the 21st Century: An Evolutionary Perspective. Ed. by J.C. Messenger. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK, International Labour Office, Geneva, Switzerland. P. 36-75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781789903751
- Ridley S. (2021) The European Parliament as legislator. ERL - Zeitschrift fur Europaische Rechtslinguistik. Europaische Rechtslinguistik, Koln, Germany. doi: 10.18716/ojs/zerl.2021/1366.
- Senatori I. (2020). The European Framework Agreement on Digitalisation: a Whiter Shade of Pale? Italian Labour Law E-Journal. Vol. 13. No. 2. P. 159-175. DOI: https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1561-8048/12045
- Sostero M., Milasi S., Hurley J., Fernandez-Macias E., Bisello M. (2020) Teleworkability and the COVID-19 crisis: a new digital divide? JRC121193. European Commission, Seville, Spain. 70 p.
- Spicker P. (2014) Social Policy: Theory and practice. Policy Press, Bristol, UK. 499 p.
- Vargas-Llave O., Weber T., Avogaro M. (2020) Industrial relations Right to disconnect in the 27 EU Member States. WPEF20019. Eurofound. 77 p. URL: https://www.eurofound.europa.eu/sites/default/files/wpef20019.pdf
Supplementary files
