Freedom of navigation in the Baltic (risks and challenges for the Russian Federation)

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

The Baltic Sea is an extremely important maritime region for Russia from the point of view of the realisation of interests in the field of maritime transportation. The Baltic Fleet bases are also located there. Civil vessels and warships of the Russian Federation enjoy here the relevant rights granted to them under international maritime law, and above all, the 1982 UN Convention on the Law of the Sea. The paper shows how some Baltic countries interpret its norms and provisions quite broadly in favor of their national interests in the field of national security. Special concerns, on their part, are raised with regard to various types of naval activities within their exclusive economic zones, where freedom of navigation must be respected. This right is now valid in the waters of the Viro Strait, as part of the Gulf of Finland. Recent statements by some countries about the need to tighten the shipping regime cannot lead to its closure. The study focuses on the legal status of the Baltic Straits. The analysis shows that the order of passage through them may differ fundamentally in peacetime and during international armed conflict. The article highlights the position of non-regional countries, primarily the United States, on freedom of navigation in the Baltic. The research reveals that this position does not always contradict Russia's interests, even in the conditions of the existing confrontation.

About the authors

Pavel Andreevich Gudev

Primakov National Research Institute of World Economy and International Relations Russian Academy of Sciences (IMEMO RAS)

Email: gudev@imemo.ru
Moscow, Russia

References

  1. Анашкина И.А. (2001) Правовой режим территориального моря на примере законодательства ряда государств Балтийского и Черноморского регионов. Московский журнал международного права. № 4. С. 188-199. doi: 10.24833/0869-0049-2001-4-188-199
  2. Вылегжанин А.Н. (ред.) (2012) Международное право. Издательство Юрайт, Москва. 904 с.
  3. Дайк Й.В. (2012) Транзитный проход через международные проливы. Московский журнал международного права. № 1. С. 160-183. doi: 10.24833/0869-0049-2012-1-160-183
  4. Колодкин А.Л., Гуцуляк В.Н., Боброва Ю.В. (2007) Мировой океан. Международно-правовой режим. Основные проблемы. Статут, Москва. 637 с.
  5. Мелков Г.М. (ред.) (2011) Международное право. РИОР, Москва. 720 с.
  6. Овлащенко А.В. (2008) Морская политика. Институт морского права, Санкт-Петербург. 400 с.
  7. Овлащенко А.В. (2012) Морской регионализм: международно-правовые аспекты институционализации. Palmarium Academic Publishing, Saarbrücken, Germany. 124 с.
  8. Caminos H., Cogliati-Bantz V. (2014) The Legal Regime of Straits: Contemporary Challenges and Solutions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. 515 p. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511777189.003
  9. Elferink Oude A.G. (2000). The Regime of Passage Through the Danish Straits. The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law. No. 15(4). P. 555-566. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/157180800X00244
  10. Farrant J. (2014) Modern Maritime Neutrality Law.International Law Studies. Vol. 90. P. 198-307. URL: https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1012&context=ils (дата обращения: 12.10.2023).
  11. Heintschel von Heinegg W. (1998) The Law of Naval Warfare and International Straits. The Law of Armed Conflict: Into the Next Millennium. Ed. by M.N. Schmitt, L.C. Green.International Law Studies. Vol. 71. Naval War College, Newport, USA. P. 263-292. URL: https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1627&context=ils (дата обращения: 12.10.2023).
  12. Kraska J, Pedrozo R. (2013) International Maritime Security Law. Martinus Nijhoff, Leiden, Germany. 940 p. doi: 10.1163/9789004233577
  13. Lott A. (2017) The Estonian Straits: Exceptions to the Strait Regime of Innocent or Transit Passage. PhD Thesis. University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia. 259 p.
  14. Lott A. (2018) The Estonian Straits. Exceptions to the Strait Regime of Innocent or Transit Passage. Brill. 308 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004365049
  15. Lott A. (2022) Hybrid Threats and the Law of the Sea. Use of Force and Discriminatory Navigational Restrictions in Straits. Brill. 302 p. doi: 10.1163/9789004509368
  16. Pedrozo R. (2021) China's Excessive Maritime Claims.International Law Studies. Vol. 97. P. 18-26 URL: https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2941&context=ils (дата обращения: 11.10.2023).
  17. Roach J.A., Smith R.W. (2012) Excessive Maritime Claims. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Leiden, Netherlands. 926 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004217720

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2023 Russian Academy of Sciences