Challenges of Interference and Disinformation in Italy: Countering New Threats to National Security

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

The focus of this article is the phenomenon of disinformation and foreign interference in Italy. The aim of the study is to examine Italy's approach to countering interference and combating disinformation. The article presents a scientific discussion on the terminology of the concept of “interference” and demonstrates that the lack of a definition does not detract from the results obtained on the topic. In countering interference in the broadest sense, as a threat to national security and the constitutional order of the country, Italy relies primarily on the national resources, where the main body is a special structure - the System for the Security of the Republic. The Special Parliamentary Committee for the Security of the Republic plays an important role as well. The issue of disinformation as an intervention tool has received more attention from researchers and institutions. The EU clearly distinguishes between “disinformation” and “misinformation”. In 2023, Italy was the first EU country to spread disinformation (in terms of the amount of deleted content from social media). In combating disinformation, Italy relies on the EU's guidelines and experience, transferring content moderation responsibilities to the EU level. The EU reacts with harsh methods, resorting to content removal and blocking of resources. Thus, the more Italy delegates its information security to the European Union, the more Rome involves in the information confrontation and war of narratives between Brussels and Moscow.

About the authors

E. A Maslova

MGIMO University

Email: e.maslova@inno.mgimo.ru
Candidate of Sciences (Politics) Moscow, Russia

References

  1. Базаркина Д.Ю. (2021) Эволюция подхода Европейского союза к борьбе с дезинформацией. Власть. Т. 29. № 6. С. 130—138.
  2. Бартенев В.И. (2018) Вмешательство во внутренние дела: спор о дефиниции. Вестник Московского Университета. Серия XXV. Международные отношения и мировая политика. Т. 10. № 4. С. 79—108.
  3. Гансер Д. (2017) Секретные армии НАТО: Операция «Гладио» и терроризм в Западной Европе. «Кучково поле», Москва. 336 с.
  4. Истомин И.А. (2023) Иностранное вмешательство во внутренние дела: проблематизация сущностно неопределимого концепта. Полис. Политические исследования. № 2. С. 120—137. DOI:10.17976/ jpps/2023.02.09
  5. Конышев В.Н., Парфенов Р.В. (2019) Гибридные войны: между мифом и реальностью. Мировая экономика и международные отношения. № 12. C. 56-66. doi: 10.20542/01312227-2019-63-12-56-66
  6. Маслова Е.А., Сорокова Е.Д. (2019) Россия - Италия: концептуальный анализ двусторонних отношений. Современная Европа. № 1. С. 48-59. doi: 10.15211/soveurope120194859
  7. Censis, Ital Communications (2023) Disinformazione e fake news in Italia. Il sistema dell’informazione alla prova dell’intelligenza artificiale. Roma, Italy. 13 p. URL: https://www.censis.it/sites/default/files/downloads/Terzo%20Rapporto%20Ital%20Communicatio ns-Censis_sintesi_1.pdf (accessed: 11.03.2024).
  8. DISPOC/LAPS, IAI (2022) Gli italiani e la politica estera 2022. IAI, Roma, Italy. 23 p. URL: https://www.iai.it/sites/default/files/laps-iai_2022.pdf (accessed: 11.03.2024).
  9. Istomin I.A. (2023) Military deterrence VS foreign interference? Record of the Cold War. MGIMO Review of International Relations. No. 1. P. 106-129. doi: 10.24833/2071-8160-2022-olf4.
  10. Levin D.H. (2020) Meddling in the Ballot Box. The Causes and Effects of Partisan Electoral Interventions. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK. 316 p.
  11. Lucas S., Mistry K. (2009) Illusions of Coherence: George F. Kennan, U.S. Strategy and Political Warfare in the Early Cold War, 1946-1950. Diplomatic History. Vol. 33. No. 1. P. 39-66.
  12. Mistry K. (2006) The Case for Political Warfare: Strategy, Organization and US Involvement in the 1948 Italian Election. Cold War History. Vol. 6. No. 3. P. 301-329. doi: 10.1080/14682740600795451
  13. Mistry K. (2014) The United States, Italy and the Origins of Cold War: Waging Political Warfare 1945-1950. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. 308 p.
  14. Morgenthau H.J. (1967). To intervene or not to intervene. Foreign Affairs. Vol. 45. No. 3. P. 425-436. doi: 10.2307/20039247
  15. O’Rourke L.A. (2019) The Strategic Logic of Covert Regime Change: US-Backed Regime Change Campaigns during the Cold War Security Studies. Vol. 29. No. 1. P. 92-127. doi: 10.1080/09636412.2020.1693620.
  16. Reus-Smit C. (2013) The concept of intervention. Review of International Studies. Vol. 39. No. 5. P. 1057-1076. doi: 10.1017/S0260210513000296.
  17. Rosenau J.N. (1968) The concept of intervention. Journal of International Affairs. Vol. 22. No. 2. P. 165-176.
  18. Rosenau J.N. (1969). Intervention as a scientific concept, Journal of Conflict Resolution. Vol. 13. No. 2. P. 149-171. DOL10.1177/002200276901300201.
  19. TrustLab (2023) Code of Practice on Disinformation. 72 p. URL: https://disinfocode.eu/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/code-of-practice-on-disinformation-september-22-2023.pdf (accessed: 11.03.2024).
  20. Vincent R.J. (2016) Nonintervention and international order. Princeton University Press, Princeton, USA. 474 p.
  21. Weber C. (1992) Reconsidering statehood: Examining the sovereignty/intervention boundary, Review of International Studies. Vol. 18. P. 199-216.
  22. Wohlforth W.C. (2020) Realism and great power subversion. International Relations. Vol. 34. No. 4. P. 459-481. doi: 10.1177/0047117820968858.
  23. Young O.R. (1968) Intervention and international systems. Journal of International Affairs. Vol. 22. No. 2. P. 177-187.
  24. Bartenev V.I. (2018) Vmeshatel'stvo vo vnutrennie dela: spor o definicii [Intervention in the Domestic Affairs: Questioning Definitions], Lomonosov World Politics Journal, 10(4), pp.79-108. (In Russian).
  25. Bazarkina D.Yu. (2021) Evolucia podkhoda Evropeiskogo soyuza k borbe s desinoformaciei [Evolution of EU approaches to countering desiformaion], Vlast, 29(6), pp. 130-138. (In Russian).
  26. Ganser D. (2017) Sekretnye armii NATO: Operaciya «Gladio» i terrorizm v Zapadnoj Evrope [NATO's Secret Armies: Operation Gladio and Terrorism in Western Europe]. «Kuchkovo pole», Moscow, Russia. (In Russian).
  27. Istomin I.A. (2023) Inostrannoe vmeshatel'stvo vo vnutrennie dela: problematizaciya sushchnostno neopredelimogo koncepta [Foreign interference in internal affairs: deconstruction of an essentially indeterminate concept], Polis. Political Studies, 2, pp. 120-137. (In Russian). doi: 10.17976/jpps/2023.02.09.
  28. Istomin I.A. (2023) Military deterrence VS foreign interference? Record of the Cold War, MGIMO Review of International Relations, 1, pp.106-129. doi: 10.24833/2071-8160-2022-olf4.
  29. Konyshev V.N., Parfyonov R.V. (2019) Gibridnye vojny: mezhdu mifom i real'nost'yu [Hybrid wars - between myth and reality]. World Economy and International Relations, 63(12), pp. 56-66. doi: 10.20542/0131-2227-2019-63-12-56-66. (In Russian).
  30. Levin D.H. (2020) Meddling in the Ballot Box. The Causes and Effects of Partisan Electoral Interventions. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
  31. Lucas S., Mistry K. (2009) Illusions of Coherence: George F. Kennan, U.S. Strategy and Political Warfare in the Early Cold War, 1946-1950, Diplomatic History, 33(1), pp. 39-66.
  32. Maslova E.A., Sorokova E.D. (2019) Rossiya - Italiya: konceptual'nyj analiz dvustoronnih otnoshenij [Russia - Italy: Conceptual analysis of bilateral relations], Sovremennaya Evropa, 1, pp. 48-59. (in Russian). doi: 10.15211/soveurope120194859.
  33. Mistry K. (2006) The Case for Political Warfare: Strategy, Organization and US Involvement in the 1948 Italian Election, Cold War History, 6(3), pp. 301-329. doi: 10.1080/14682740600795451.
  34. Mistry K. (2014) The United States, Italy and the Origins of Cold War: Waging Political Warfare 1945-1950. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
  35. Morgenthau H.J. (1967). To intervene or not to intervene, Foreign Affairs, 45(3), pp. 425-436. doi: 10.2307/20039247.
  36. O’Rourke L.A. (2019) The Strategic Logic of Covert Regime Change: US-Backed Regime Change Campaigns during the Cold War, Security Studies, 29(1), pp.92-127. doi: 10.1080/09636412.2020.1693620.
  37. DISPOC/LAPS, IAI (2022) Gli italiani e la politica estera 2022, IAI, Roma, Italy. URL: https://www.iai.it/sites/default/files/laps-iai_2022.pdf (accessed: 11.03.2024).
  38. Reus-Smit C. (2013) The concept of intervention, Review of International Studies, 39(5), pp. 1057-1076. doi: 10.1017/S0260210513000296.
  39. Rosenau J.N. (1968) The concept of intervention, Journal of InternationalAffairs, 22(2), pp. 165-176.
  40. Rosenau J.N. (1969). Intervention as a scientific concept, Journal of Conflict Resolution, 13(2), pp. 149-171. doi: 10.1177/002200276901300201.
  41. Censis, Ital Communications (2023) Disinformazione e fake news in Italia. Il sistema dell’informazione alla prova dell’intelligenza artificiale, Roma, Italy. URL: https://www.censis.it/sites/default/files/downloads/Terzo%20Rapporto%20Ital%20Communicatio ns-Censis_sintesi_1.pdf (accessed: 11.03.2024).
  42. TrustLab (2023) Code of Practice on Disinformation. URL: https://disinfocode.eu/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/code-of-practice-on-disinformation-september-22-2023.pdf (accessed: 11.03.2024).
  43. Vincent R.J. (2016) Nonintervention and international order. Princeton University Press, Princeton, USA.
  44. Weber C. (1992) Reconsidering statehood: Examining the sovereignty/intervention boundary, Review of International Studies, 18, pp. 199-216.
  45. Wohlforth W.C. (2020) Realism and great power subversion, International Relations, 34(4), pp. 459-481. doi: 10.1177/0047117820968858.
  46. Young O.R. (1968) Intervention and international systems, Journal of International Affairs, 22(2), pp. 177-187.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

Copyright (c) 2024 Russian Academy of Sciences