The phenomenon of resentment: historical allusion or harsh reality?

Capa

Citar

Texto integral

Acesso aberto Acesso aberto
Acesso é fechado Acesso está concedido
Acesso é fechado Somente assinantes

Resumo

The article examines evolution and content of the resentment phenomenon. According to the theory of F. Nietzsche, resentment is the feeling experienced by a person towards his enemy or towards the one whom he considers guilty of his failures, which causes his aggression towards another. L. Fishman traces various historical forms of resentment, drawing attention to the fact that the main subject of resentment actions is often not the plebeian, but bearers of the values of the ruling class. Under these conditions, resentment becomes the most important instrument of political struggle, the subject of appeal from one social force to another. Thus, the author studied the phenomenon of resentment from another perspective than the founders of this concept, F. Nietzsche and M. Scheler. Нe treats it as a type of false consciousness, and the concept of resentment in its original form as its criticism from the right. In the modern world, the phenomenon of resentment is embodied in a wide variety of forms – from the precariat to confrontation between states. And as long as there is a division of society into the strong and the weak in the world, social inequality, double standards, resentment will find favorable soil.

Texto integral

Acesso é fechado

Sobre autores

Oleg Roy

Institute of Philosophy and Law Ural Branch RAS

Autor responsável pela correspondência
Email: roi_omsk@mail.ru

Dr. Sci. (Sociol.), Prof., Leading Researcher at the Institute of Philosophy and Law

Rússia, Yekaterinburg

Bibliografia

  1. Бреслер М. Г. Когнитариат. Специфика формирования и перспективы развития в России // Дискурс-Пи. 2023. Т. 20. № 4. С. 65–81. doi: 10.17506/18179568_2023_20_4_65.
  2. Голенкова З. Т., Голиусова Ю. В. Прекариат как новая группа наемных работников // Уровень жизни населения регионов России. 2015. № 1(195). С. 47–57. EDN TQALIF.
  3. Пикетти Т. Капитал в XXI веке / Пер. с англ. М.: Ad Marginem, 2015.
  4. Тощенко Ж. Т. Публичный и приватный жизненный мир прекариата: основные черты и ориентиры // Социологические исследования. 2021. № 11. С. 24–36. doi: 10.31857/S013216250016200-3.
  5. Milanovic B. Visions of inequality From the French Revolution to the End of the Cold War. Harvard University Press, 2023. ISBN: 9780674264144.
  6. References
  7. Bresler M. G. (2023) Cognitariat. Specifics of formation and development prospects in Russia. Diskurs-Pi [Discourse-Pi]. T. 20. No. 4: 65–81. (In Russ.)
  8. Golenkova Z. T. Goliusova Yu.V. (2015) Precariat as a new group of hired workers. Uroven’ zhizni naseleniya regionov Rossii [Living standards of the population of Russian regions]. No. 1(195): 47–57. (In Russ.)
  9. Piketty T. (2015) Capital in the XXI century. Moskow: Ad Marginem. (In Russ.)
  10. Toshchenko Zh. T. (2021) Public and private life world of the precariat: main features and guidelines. Sotsiologicheskiye issledovaniya. [Sociological studies]. No. 11: 24–36. (In Russ.)
  11. Milanovic B. (2023) Visions of inequality From the French Revolution to the End of the Cold War. Harvard University Press.

Arquivos suplementares

Arquivos suplementares
Ação
1. JATS XML

Declaração de direitos autorais © Russian Academy of Sciences, 2024