The Great Game and the border issue in the Pamirs in the reports of Ralph Cobbold, 1898‒1899
- Authors: Bukharin M.D.1
-
Affiliations:
- Institute of World History, Russian Academy of Sciences
- Issue: No 4 (2024)
- Pages: 46-56
- Section: Modern history
- URL: https://rjsvd.com/0130-3864/article/view/671688
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/S0130386424040045
- ID: 671688
Cite item
Abstract
The 1890s were a time of growing tension in Central Asia, stemming both from the geopolitical confrontation between the Russian and British empires and from the desire of Afghanistan and China to realise their own national interests and use the struggle of the dominant political forces to their own ends. One of the most difficult issues was the border dispute, i.e. fixing the border between Russia and Afghanistan, on the one hand, and Russia and China, on the other. Britain sought to exploit the differences on this issue to its own advantage, which could well have led to the outbreak of hostilities. The mechanism for identifying weaknesses in Russia’s position in the Pamirs comes out clearly in the 1898‒1899 reports of the British intelligence officer Ralph Cobbold, preserved in the National Archives of India. They characterise the actions of the Russian authorities in the Pamirs, the attitude of the local population to the opposing sides, and potential instruments of local influence that would allow Britain to bring the region under its control. The Russian diplomatic and military administrations were aware of the aspirations of the British Empire and used both the “stick” and the “carrot” to maintain the status quo in the region: in some issues they had to make concessions, in others the Russian side acted rigidly. Such an approach not only kept the Central Asian region in the frames of peaceful development, but also was one of the foundations of the conclusion of the Russian-British pact on the division of spheres of influence in the Middle East and Central Asia in 1907, which put an end to the Great Game and allowed the formation of the Triple Anglo-Franco-Russian alliance.
Keywords
Full Text

About the authors
Mikhail D. Bukharin
Institute of World History, Russian Academy of Sciences
Author for correspondence.
Email: michabucha@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3590-016X
Scopus Author ID: 16308918000
ResearcherId: R-9643-2017
действительный член РАН, доктор исторических наук, главный научный сотрудник
Russian Federation, MoscowReferences
- “I s kazach’ego piketa byl uzh viden Gimalaj”. Pamir v fotoobjektive poruchika Pavla Rodstvennogo [“And the Himalayan was already visible from the Cossack picket”. Pamir in the photographic lens of Lieutenant Pavel Kindred] / avt.-sost. M.K. Baskhanov, S.L. Shevel’chinskaya. Sankt-Peterburg, 2019. (In Russ.)
- Bukharin M.D. Global’naya neopredelennost’ kak faktor razvitiya mezhdunarodnykh processov (rez.: Ar.A. Ulunyan. Turkestanskij placdarm. 1917‒1922. Britanskoe razvedyvatel’noe soobshchestvo i britanskoe pravitel’stvo. Izd. 2-e. Moskva [Global uncertainty as a factor in the development of international processes (review.: Ar.A. Ulunyan. Turkestan bridgehead. 1917‒1922. British intelligence community and British government. Ed. 2nd. Moscow, 2020] // Mezhdunarodnye processy [International processes]. 2020. № 4. S. 158‒161. (In Russ.)
- Bukharin M.D., Tunkina I.V. Perepiska N.F. Petrovskogo, V.R. Rozena i S.F. Ol’denburga [Correspondence of N.F. Petrovsky, V.R. Rosen and S.F. Oldenburg] // Vostochnyj Turkestan i Mongoliya. Istoriya izucheniya v konce XIX – pervoj treti XX veka. T. 1. Epistolyarnye dokumenty iz arkhivov Rossijskoj akademii nauk i Turfanskogo sobraniya [East Turkestan and Mongolia. The history of study at the end of the 19th – the first third of the 20th centuries. Vol. 1. Epistolary documents from the archives of the Russian Academy of Sciences and the Turpan collection]. Moskva, 2018. S. 83‒209. (In Russ.)
- Bukhert V.G. …I ego russkij portret [...And his Russian portrait] // Petrovski N.F. Turkestanskie pis’ma [Turkestan letters] / otv. red. V.S. Myasnikov, sost. V.G. Bukhert. Мoskva, 2010. S. 20‒67. (In Russ.)
- Hopkirk P. Bol’shaya igra protiv Rossii. Aziatskij sindrom [Great game against Russia. Asian syndrome]. Moskva, 2004. (In Russ.)
- Ishenko N.S. “Afganskij vopros” v rossijskoj konservativnoj publicistike v seredine 1880-h godov [“The Afghan Question” in Russian conservative journalism in the mid-1880s] // Novaya i Novejshaya Istoriya [Modern and Contemporary History]. 2022. № 4. S. 72‒81. doi: 10.31857/S013038640018389-5 (In Russ.)
- Kutsenko B.O. Russko-anglijskij konflikt na Pamire: nesostoyavshayasya vojna 1902 goda [Russian-English conflict in the Pamirs: the failed war of 1902] // Vestnik Ryazanskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta im. S.A. Esenina [Bulletin of S.A. Yesenin Ryazan State University]. 2020. № 2 (67). S. 67–77. (In Russ.)
- Marshrutnoe opisanie puti ot Urumchi cherez Guchen i Barkul’ v Hami [Route description of the way from Urumqi via Guchen and Barkul to Hami] / izd. podg. M.K. Baskhanov, M.D. Bukharin, I.V. Tunkina // Vostochnyj Turkestan i Mongoliya. Istoriya izucheniya v konce XIX – pervoj treti XX veka. T. IV. Materialy Russkih Turkestanskih ekspedicij 1909–1910 i 1914–1915 gg. akademika S.F. Ol’denburga [East Turkestan and Mongolia. The history of study at the end of the 19th – the first third of the 20th centuries. Vol. IV. Materials of the Russian Turkestan expeditions 1909–1910 and 1914–1915 academician S.F. Oldenburg] / pod obshch. red. M.D. Bukharina, V.S. Myasnikova, I.V. Tunkinoj. Moskva, 2020. S. 440‒449. (In Russ.)
- Myasnikov V.S. Obraz N.F. Petrovskogo v anglijskom zerkale [The image of N.F. Petrovsky in the English mirror] // Petrovski N.F. Turkestanskie pis’ma [Turkestan letters] / otv. red. V.S. Myasnikov, sost. V.G. Bukhert. Moskva, 2010. S. 4‒20. (In Russ.)
- Postnikov A.V. “Istoricheskie prava” sosednih gosudarstv i geografiya Pamira kak argumenty v “Bol‘shoj Igre” Britanii i Rossii (1869–1896 gg.) [“Historical rights” of neighboring states and the geography of the Pamirs as arguments in the “Great Game” of Britain and Russia (1869–1896)] // Acta Slavica Iaponica. 2000. № 17. S. 33‒99. (In Russ.)
- Postnikov A.V. Skhvatka na kryshe mira. Politiki, razvedchiki i geografy v bor’be za Pamir v XIX v. (Monografiya v dokumentakh) [Skirmish on the roof of the world. Politicians, scouts and geographers in the struggle for the Pamirs in the 19th century (Monograph in documents)]. Moskva, 2001. (In Russ.)
- Russko-kitajskie dogovorno-pravovye akty [Russian-Chinese legal acts]. 1689‒1916 / pod obsh. red. akademika V.S. Myasnikova. Moskva, 2004. (In Russ.)
- Sergeev E.Yu. Bol’shaya igra, 1856‒1907: mify i realii rossijsko-britanskih otnoshenij v Central’noj i Vostochnoj Azii [Great game, 1856‒1907: myths and realities of Russian-British relations in Central and East Asia]. Moskva, 2012. (In Russ.)
- Tageev B.L. (Rustam-bek). Pamirskie pokhody [Pamir campaigns] / vstupl., komment. M.D. Buharina. Moskva, 2017. (In Russ.)
- Cobbold R.P. Innermost Asia. Travel and Sport in the Pamirs. London, 1900.
- Curzon G.N. Russia in Central Asia in 1889 and the Anglo-Russian Question. London, 1889.
- Johnson R. Spying for the Empire. The Great Game in Central and South Asia, 1757–1947. London, 2006.
- Middleton R. Russians in the Great Game. Bishkek, 2019 (University of Central Asia. Research Paper. 2).
- Morgan G. Ney Elias: Explorer and Envoy Extraordinary in High Asia. London, 1971.
- Skrine C. Nightingale P. Macartney at Kashgar: New Light on British, Chinese and Russian Activities in Sinkiang, 1890–1918. London, 1973.
- Warikoo K. “Great Game” on the Kashmir Frontiers // Himalayan Frontiers of India. Historical, Geo-Political and Strategic Perspectives / ed. K. Warikoo. London; New York, 2009. P. 14‒36.
Supplementary files
