Phase transitions in poly(vinylidene fluoride)-based composite under mechanical stresses

Capa

Citar

Texto integral

Acesso aberto Acesso aberto
Acesso é fechado Acesso está concedido
Acesso é fechado Somente assinantes

Resumo

In this work the phase transition in composites based on polyvinylidene fluoride and cobalt ferrite nanoparticles under uniaxial stretching at 100, 200 and 300% is investigated. It was found that when the composite is stretched at 300%, there is a maximum increase in the β-phase fraction from 1% for the unstretched sample to 91%, while the electroactive phase increases from 74 to 92%. It was also found that tensile stretching of the composites leads to an increase in tensile strength: from 5.7 to 85.0 MPa. This tensile pattern also contributes to an increase in coercivity, which is due to the increase in the interparticle distance in the composite structure. These results emphasise the importance of mechanical properties and phase changes in polymer composites containing ferrites for their future applications.

Texto integral

Acesso é fechado

Sobre autores

P. Vorontsov

Kant Baltic Federal University

Autor responsável pela correspondência
Email: pavorontsov@kantiana.ru
Rússia, Kaliningrad

V. Salnikov

Kant Baltic Federal University

Email: pavorontsov@kantiana.ru
Rússia, Kaliningrad

V. Savin

Kant Baltic Federal University

Email: pavorontsov@kantiana.ru
Rússia, Kaliningrad

S. Vorontsov

Kant Baltic Federal University

Email: pavorontsov@kantiana.ru
Rússia, Kaliningrad

L. Panina

Kant Baltic Federal University; National University of Science and Technology “MISIS”

Email: pavorontsov@kantiana.ru
Rússia, Kaliningrad; Moscow

P. Ershov

Kant Baltic Federal University

Email: pavorontsov@kantiana.ru
Rússia, Kaliningrad

V. Rodionova

Kant Baltic Federal University

Email: pavorontsov@kantiana.ru
Rússia, Kaliningrad

Bibliografia

  1. Saxena P., Shukla P. // Adv. Compos. Hybrid Mater. 2021. V. 4. P. 8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42114-021-00217-0
  2. Dallaev R., Pisarenko T., Sobola D. et al. // Polymers (Basel). 2022. V. 14. № 22. P. 1. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14224793
  3. Su Y.P., Sim L.N., Li X. et al. // J. Memb. Sci. 2021. V. 620. P. 118818. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2020.118818
  4. Bichurin M., Petrov R., Sokolov O. et al. // Sensors. 2021. V. 21. № 18. P. 6232. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21186232
  5. Narita F., Fox M. // Adv. Eng. Mater. 2018. V. 20. № 5. P. 1. https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.201700743
  6. Alibakhshi H., Esfahani H., Sharifi E. // Ceram. Int. 2024. V. 50. № 5. P. 8017. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0272884223040506
  7. Liu F., Hashim N.A., Liu Y., Abed R. // J. Memb. Sci. 2011. V. 375. № 1–2. P. 1. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2011.03.014
  8. Lovinger A.J. // Science. 1983. V. 220. № 4602. P. 1115. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.220.4602.1115
  9. Pereira N., Lima A., Lanceros-Mendez S., Martins P. // Materials. 2020. V. 13. № 18. P. 4033. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13184033
  10. Omelyanchik A., Antipova V., Gritsenko Ch. et al. // Nanomaterials. 2021. V. 11. № 5. P. 1154. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11051154
  11. Antipova V., Omelyanchik A., Sobolev K. et al. // Nanobiotechnology Reports. 2023. V. 18. Suppl. 1. P. S186. https://doi.org/10.1134/S2635167623600967
  12. Koç M., Demirci C., Parali L. et al. // J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2022. V. 33. № 10. P. 8048. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-022-07956-w
  13. Cozza E.S., Monticelli O., Marsano E., Cebe P. // Polym. Int. 2013. V. 62. № 1. P. 41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pi.4314
  14. Sharma M., Madras G., Bose S. // Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2014. V. 16. № 28. P. 14792. http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c4cp01004c
  15. Chen B., Yuan M., Ma R. et al. // Chem. Eng. J. 2022. V. 433. P. 134475. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2021.134475
  16. Jovanović S., Spreitzer M., Otoničar M. et al. // J. Alloys Compd. 2014. V. 589. P. 271. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2013.11.217
  17. Botvin V., Fetisova A., Mukhortova Y. et al. // Polymers. 2023. V. 15. № 14. P. 3135. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym15143135
  18. Terzić I., Meereboer N.L., Mellema H.H. et al. // J. Mater. Chem. C. 2019. V. 7. № 4. P. 968. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8TC05017A
  19. Ribeiro C., Costa C., Correia D. et al. // Nat. Protoc. 2018. V. 13. № 4. P. 681. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2017.157
  20. Sayyar S., Aslibeiki B., Asgari A. // Phys. Appl. Mater. 2022. V. 2. P. 165. https://doi.org/10.22075/ppam.2022.29079.1047
  21. Stoner B., Wohlfarth P.A. // Phys. Dep. 1948. V. 250. № 826. P. 599. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsta.1948.0007
  22. Salnikov V.D., Aga-Tagieva S., Kolesnikova V. et al. // J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2024. V. 595. P. 171498. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2023.171498
  23. Zhang L., Li S., Zhu Z. et al. // Adv. Funct. Mater. 2023. V. 33. № 38. P. 2301302. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202301302
  24. Satapathy S., Pawar S., Gupta P.K., Varma K. // Bull. Mater. Sci. 2011. V. 34. № 4. P. 727. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12034-011-0187-0
  25. Cai X., Lei T., Sun D., Lin L. // RSC Adv. 2017. V. 7. № 25. P. 15382. http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C7RA01267E
  26. Peters A., Candau S.J. // Macromolecules. 1986. V. 19. P. 1952. https://doi.org/10.1021/ma00161a029
  27. Developments in Crystalline Polymers – 1. / Ed. Bassett D.C. Dordrecht: Springer, 1982. 279 p. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-7343-5
  28. Salimi A., Yousefi A.A. // J. Polym. Sci. B. Polym. Phys. 2004. V. 42. № 18. P. 3487. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/polb.20223
  29. Orudzhev F., Ramazanov S., Sobola D. et al. // Nano Energy. B. 2021. V. 90. P. 106586. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2021.106586
  30. Silva M.P., Costa C.M., Sencadas V. et al. // J. Polym. Res. 2011. V. 18. № 6. P. 1451. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10965-010-9550-x
  31. Keshmirizadeh E., Modarress H., Eliassi A., Mansoori G.A. // Eur. Polym. J. 2003. V. 39. № 6. P. 1141. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0014-3057(02)00373-7
  32. Miri V., Persyn O., Seguela R., Lefebvre J.M. // Eur. Polym. J. 2011. V. 47. № 1. P. 88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2010.09.006
  33. Zhou Y., Liu W., Tan B. et al. // Polymers. 2021. V. 13. № 7. P. 998. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym13070998

Arquivos suplementares

Arquivos suplementares
Ação
1. JATS XML
Baixar
2. Fig. 1. X-ray diffraction pattern for CoFe2O4 nanoparticles (left) and photos of samples S0, S100, S200, S300 (right).

Baixar (188KB)
Metadados
3. Fig. 2. Field dependence of magnetization for CoFe2O4 and CoFe2O4@OK (left) and PVDF–CoFe2O4@OK at different degrees of stretching (right).

Baixar (135KB)
Metadados
4. Fig. 3. X-ray diffraction patterns (left) and IR spectra (right) for PVDF–CoFe2O4@OK composites with different degrees of stretching. X-ray diffraction pattern of unstretched PVDF–CoFe2O4@OK composite (lower graph).

Baixar (274KB)
Metadados
5. Fig. 4. DSC curves for composites S0, S100, S200, S300.

Baixar (99KB)
Metadados
6. Fig. 5. Deformation curves of composites S0, S100, S200, S300.

Baixar (85KB)
Metadados

Declaração de direitos autorais © Russian Academy of Sciences, 2025