LOCAL ATOMIC ENVIRONMENT OF Zn 2+  IONS IN A LOW-CONCENTRATION ZnCl 2  AQUEOUS SOLUTION: XANES STUDY

V. Yu. Lysenko; Лысенко В. Ю.; M. A. Kremennaya; Кременная М. А.; G. E. Yalovega; Яловега Г. Э.

doi:10.31857/S002347612302011X

LOCAL ATOMIC ENVIRONMENT OF Zn²⁺ IONS IN A LOW-CONCENTRATION ZnCl₂ AQUEOUS SOLUTION: XANES STUDY

Authors: Lysenko V.Y.¹, Kremennaya M.A.¹, Yalovega G.E.¹
Affiliations:
1. Faculty of Physics, Southern Federal University, Rostov-on-Don, 344090 Russia
Issue: Vol 68, No 2 (2023)
Pages: 228-233
Section: СТРУКТУРА НЕОРГАНИЧЕСКИХ СОЕДИНЕНИЙ
URL: https://rjsvd.com/0023-4761/article/view/673494
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/S002347612302011X
EDN: https://elibrary.ru/BQHCUB
ID: 673494

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access
Restricted Access

Access granted
Restricted Access

Subscription Access

Abstract
About the authors
References
Supplementary files
Statistics

Abstract

The diverse local environment of zinc ions in a ZnCl₂ solution, depending on the symmetry, ligand type, and solution concentration, has been analyzed using the data in the literature. Experimental zinc K-edge XANES spectra in a ZnCl₂ aqueous solution with a critically low concentration (10^–3 М) have been theoretically analyzed. It is shown that Zn(H₂O) complexes with Zn²⁺ ions in the octahedral coordination environment of water molecules are dominant in this solution.

Keywords

ZnCl2 AQUEOUS SOLUTION, XANES STUDY

About the authors

V. Yu. Lysenko

Faculty of Physics, Southern Federal University, Rostov-on-Don, 344090 Russia

Email: yalovega@sfedu.ru
Россия, Ростов-на-Дону

M. A. Kremennaya

Faculty of Physics, Southern Federal University, Rostov-on-Don, 344090 Russia

Email: yalovega@sfedu.ru
Россия, Ростов-на-Дону

G. E. Yalovega

Faculty of Physics, Southern Federal University, Rostov-on-Don, 344090 Russia

Author for correspondence.
Email: yalovega@sfedu.ru
Россия, Ростов-на-Дону

References

Sandstead H.H. // Handbook on the Toxicology of Metals, 4th ed., Elsevier, 2014. P. 1369.
Pipan-Tkalec Z., Drobne D., Jemec A. et al. // Toxicology. 2010. V. 269. P. 198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tox.2009.08.004
Kula I., Uğurlu M., Karaoğlu H. et al. // Bioresour. Technol. 2008. V. 99. P. 492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2007.01.015
Yusuff A.S., Lala M.A., Thompson-Yusuff K.A. et al. // S. Afr. J. Chem. Eng. 2022. V. 42. P. 138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajce.2022.08.002
Wen D., Fang Z., He H. et al. // Int. J. Chem. React. Eng. 2018. V. 16. P. 20170256. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijcre-2017-0256
Kruh R.F., Standleyc L. // Inorg. Chem. 1962. V. 1. P. 941.
Eastela J., Giaquintap V., March N.H. et al. // Chem. Phys. 1983. V. 76. P. 125.
Parchment O.G., Vincent M.A., Hillier I.H. // J. Phys. Chem. 1996. V. 100. P. 9689.
Pokhrel N., Lamichhane H.P. // J. Sci. Technol. 2018. V. 22. P. 148. https://doi.org/10.3126/jist.v22i2.19607
Yalovega G.E., Kremennaya M.A. // Crystallography Reports. 2020. V. 65. P. 813. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063774520060395
Фетисов Г.В. Синхротронное излучение. Методы исследования структуры веществ. М.: Физматлит, 2007. 672 с.
Aziz E.F., Ottosson N., Bonhommeau S. et al. // Phys. Rev. Lett. 2009. V. 102. P. 68103. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.06810313
Shi W., Punta M., Bohon J. et al. // Genome Res. 2011. V. 21. P. 898. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.115097.110
Uchikoshi M., Shinoda K. // Struct. Chem. 2019. V. 30. P. 945. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11224-018-1245-7
D’Angelo P., Zitolo A., Ceccacci F. et al. // J. Chem. Phys. 2011. V. 135. P. 15450. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3653939
D'Angelo P., Barone V., Chillemi G. et al. // J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002. V. 124. P. 1958. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja015685x
Dreier P., Rabe P. // J. Phys. Colloq. 1986. V. 47. P. C8-809. https://doi.org/10.1051/jphyscol:19868155
Новикова Н.Н., Якунин С.Н., Ковальчук М.В. и др. // Кристаллография. 2019. Т. 64. № 6. С. 931.
Joly Y. // Phys. Rev. B. 2001. V. 63. P. 125120.
Silber H.B., Simon D., Gaizer F. // Inorg. Chem. 1984. V. 23. P. 2844.
Brugger J.L., Liu W., Etschmann B. et al. // Chem. Geol. 2016. V. 447. P. 219.
Alloteau F., Valbi V., Majérus O. et al. // Glass Atmospheric Alteration: Cultural Heritage, Industrial and Nuclear Glasses. Hermann, 2019. P. 192.
Nelson J. // J. Synchrotron Radiat. 2021. V. 28. P. 1119. https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600577521004033
Walker A., Vratsanos M., Kozawa S. et al. // Soft Matter. 2019. V. 15. P. 7596.
Harris D.J., Brodholt J.P., Harding J.H. et al. // Mol. Phys. 2001. V. 99. P. 825. https://doi.org/10.1080/00268970010015588
Paschina G., Piccaluga G., Pinna G. et al. // J. Chem. Phys. 1983. V. 78. P. 5745.
Takahashi M., Tanida H., Kawauchi S. et al. // J. Synchrotron Radiat. 1999. V. 6. P. 278.
Magini M., Licheri G., Paschina G. et al. // X-ray Diffraction of Ions in Aqueous Solution: Hydration and Complex Formation. CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL. 1988. P. 284.
Paschina G., Piccaluga G., Pinna G. et al. // J. Chem. Phys. 1983. V. 78. P. 5745.
Liu W., Borg S.J., Testemale D. et al. // Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta. 2011. V. 75. P. 1227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2010.12.002
Powelld H., Gullidgep M.N., Neilsong W. et al. // Molec. Phys. 1990. V. 71. P. 1107.