An Increase in The Cross-Section of Two-Photon Absorption of Styrene Dye in Supramolecular Complexes with Cucurbituriles

N. H. Petrov; Петров Н. Х.; A. A. Ivanov; Иванов А. А.; D. A. Ivanov; Иванов Д. А.; A. B. Fedotov; Федотов А. Б.; A. А. Lanin; Ланин А. А.; A. S. Chebotarev; Чеботарев А. С.

doi:10.31857/S0023119324030033

An Increase in The Cross-Section of Two-Photon Absorption of Styrene Dye in Supramolecular Complexes with Cucurbituriles

Authors: Petrov N.H.¹^,2, Ivanov A.A.¹^,3, Ivanov D.A.¹, Fedotov A.B.³, Lanin A.А.³, Chebotarev A.S.³
Affiliations:
1. Crystallography and Photonics Federal Research Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences
2. Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology (National Research University)
3. Lomonosov Moscow State University
Issue: Vol 58, No 3 (2024)
Pages: 198-202
Section: PHOTONICS
URL: https://rjsvd.com/0023-1193/article/view/661344
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/S0023119324030033
EDN: https://elibrary.ru/UUSJPZ
ID: 661344

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access
Restricted Access

Access granted
Restricted Access

Subscription Access

Abstract

Two-photon absorption cross sections of aqueous solutions of the styryl dye trans-4-[4-(dimethylamino)styryl]-1-methylpyridinium iodide (DASPI) and its inclusion complexes with cucurbit[n]urils (CB[n] n = 6–8) were measured using fluorescence spectroscopy. A nonmonotonic dependence of the cross-section size on the excitation wavelength and on the cavitand cavity size was found. Compared with a free dye, a sevenfold increase in the two-photon absorption cross section was observed in DASPI inclusion complexes with CB[8] at an excitation wavelength of 980 nm.

Keywords

two-photon absorption, styrene dyes, cucurbituriles, inclusion complexes

Full Text

References

Göppert-Mayer M. // Ann. Phys. 1931. V. 401. P. 273–294.
Collini E. // Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2012. V. 14. P. 3725–3736.
Tsai T.-H., Lin C.-Y., Tsai H.J. et al. // Opt. Lett. 2006. V. 31. № 7. P. 930–932.
Wiedenmann J., Oswald F., Nienhaus G. // IUBMB life. 2009. V. 61. № 11. P. 1029–1042.
Chudakov D.M., Matz M.V., Lukyanov S., Lukyanov K.A. // Physiol. Rev. 2010. V. 90. P. 1103–1163.
Wloka T., Gottschaldt M., Schubert U.S. // Chem. Eur. J. 2022. V. 28.
Zheng Y.-C., Zhao Y.-Y., Zheng M.-L. // ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2019. V. 11. P. 1782–1789.
Lee J.W., Samal S., Selvapalam N. et al. // Acc. Chem. Res. 2003. V. 36. P. 621.
Dsouza R.N., Pischel U., Nau W.M. // Chem. Rev. 2011. V. 111. P. 7941–7980.
Ivanov D.A., Svirida A.D., Petrov N.H. // Chemistry of high energies. 2022. V. 56. № 3. P. 171–180.
Ivanov D.A., Petrov N.Kh., Nikitina E.A. et al. // J. Phys. Chem. A. 2011. V. 115. P. 4505.
Lanin A.A., Chebotarev A.S., Pochechuev M.S. et al. // J. Biophotonics. 2019. V. 13.
Chebotarev A.S., Lanin A.A., Raevskii R.I. et al. // J. Raman Spectroscopy. 2021. V. 52. P. 1552–1560.
Makarov N.S., Drobizhev M., Rebane A. // Optics express. 2008. V. 16. P. 4029–4047.
Reguardati S., Pahapill J., Mikhailov A. et al. // Optics Express. 2016. V. 24. P. 9053–9066.
Xu Ch., Webb W.-W. // J. Opt. Soc. Am. B. 1996. V. 13. P. 481–491.
Svirida A.D., Ivanov D.A., Petrov N.H. et al. // Chemistry of high energies. 2016. V. 50. № 1. P. 23–28.