Assessment of satisfaction with the quality and safety of food products in the population of Russian megacities
- Authors: Lebedeva-Nesevria N.N.1, Barg A.O.1, Sirkovskaya T.V.2
-
Affiliations:
- Federal Scientific Center for Medical and Preventive Health Risk Management Technologies
- Perm State National Research University
- Issue: Vol 104, No 5 (2025)
- Pages: 607-614
- Section: FOOD HYGIENE
- Published: 15.12.2025
- URL: https://rjsvd.com/0016-9900/article/view/689402
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.47470/0016-9900-2025-104-5-607-614
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/wuvhai
- ID: 689402
Cite item
Abstract
Introduction. People’s satisfaction with food safety and quality is an important component of overall satisfaction with a sanitary-epidemiological situation on a given territory. It is based on consumer criteria of quality and safety, which do not have the same significance.The aim of this study was to assess satisfaction with food quality and safety in population in Russian megacities determined relying on consumer criteria.Materials and methods. The study involved accomplishing a formalized survey, which was conducted in Novosibirsk and Perm among people aged 18 years and older (river sampling, quotas per age, sex and place of residence). Data were collected over the period between October 6, 2024 and November 6, 2024. A specifically designed survey tool was used in the process, which enabled calculating an integral index of satisfaction for each respondent.Results. Several key criteria were named by consumers to detect a product quality for all product groups such as ‘freshness; expiration date has not been reached’ (this criterion is among top five for all product groups suggested for evaluation); ‘pleasant taste’; ‘conforms to State Standards (GOST), quality standards’. Safety criteria determined by consumers included ‘storage under proper conditions’; ‘absence of any strange taste’; ‘expiration date has not been reached’. Significance of these criteria varied depending on consumers’ sex, age, family situation and economic status. The lowest level of consumer satisfaction with product quality, according to the integral index estimation, was identified for soft drinks (21.4 % of consumers were unsatisfied, the index value was ≤0.4) and vegetables (19.7%); the lowest level of satisfaction with food safety was identified for eggs (27.9% of consumers unsatisfied, the index value was ≤0.4), bread and bakery products (26.6%), poultry (23.9%), meat and meat products (23.8%), milk and milk products (22.6%). Satisfaction with food safety is a) lower than satisfaction with quality, b) is different in various socio-demographic groups.Limitations. The research object was represented by people who live in cities with their population exceeding 1 million; a sample was created by using non-random techniques and this resulted in its deviation from a total population per several social and demographic parameters (this deviation was partially compensated for by using the weighting procedure).Conclusion. It is important to consider consumers’ satisfaction with food quality and safety when developing activities aimed at communications with executive regional and local authorities in RF regions as well as with population as regards the existing sanitary-epidemiological situation. Various managerial actions have been recommended depending on how people are distributed per categories of satisfaction, which were created using the results obtained by estimations based on the integral index.Compliance with ethical standards. The study was accomplished in accordance with the ethical principles stated in The ICC/ESOMAR International Code on Market, Opinion and Social Research and Data Analytics, the Ethical Code of the International Sociological Association (ISA), and the Ethical Code of the Russian Society of Sociologists. All participants gave informed voluntary written consent to participate in the study.Contribution: Lebedeva-Nesevria N.A. – the concept and design of the study, writing text, editing; Barg A.O. – data analysis, writing text; Sirkovskaya T.V. – literature review, material collection and primary data processing. All authors are responsible for the integrity of all parts of the manuscript and approval of the manuscript final version.Conflict of interest. The authors declare no conflict of interest.Funding. The study had no sponsorship.Received: February 19, 2025 / Revised: March 3, 2025 / Accepted: March 26, 2025 / Published: June 27, 2025
Keywords
About the authors
Natalia N. Lebedeva-Nesevria
Federal Scientific Center for Medical and Preventive Health Risk Management Technologies
Email: natnes@list.ru
Anastasiya O. Barg
Federal Scientific Center for Medical and Preventive Health Risk Management Technologies
Email: an-bg@yandex.ru
Tatyana V. Sirkovskaya
Perm State National Research University
Email: tsirk@psu.ru
References
- Petrescu D.C., Vermeir I., Petrescu-Mag R.M. Consumer understanding of food quality, healthiness, and environmental impact: a cross-national perspective. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2019; 17(1): 169. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17010169
- Sadilek T. Perception of food quality by consumers: literature review. Eur. Res. Stud. J. 2019; 22(1): 52–62. https://doi.org/10.35808/ersj/1407
- Sari N.T.P., Yulianto E., Sunarti. A literature review: unraveling the dimensions of food quality and its influence on consumer satisfaction. KnE Soc. Sci. 2024; 9(13): 453–67. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v9i11.15835
- Ромир. Россияне рассказали о критериях качественных продуктов; 2021. Доступно: https://romir.ru/studies/rossiyane-rasskazali-o-kriteriyah-kachestvennyh-produktov
- Mohaydin G., et al. Effect of food quality on customer perceived satisfaction level and mediating effect of food safety on them. Int. J. New Technol. Res. 2017; 3(1): 34–41.
- Аналитический центр НАФИ. Тренды потребления россиянами продуктов питания; 2023. Доступно: https://nafi.ru/upload/iblock/c54/c546e4ec28e648c64ddfa517f9512c99.pdf
- Makowska M., Boguszewski R., Hrehorowicz A. Generational differences in food choices and consumer behaviors in the context of sustainable development. Foods. 2024; 13(4): 521. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13040521
- Фонд «Общественное мнение» (ФОМ). Качество питания россиян; 2007. Доступно: https://bd.fom.ru/report/cat/business/ec_goods/d071123
- Криштафович В.И., Криштафович Д.В. Исследование удовлетворенности потребителей московского региона рыбной продукцией. Фундаментальные и прикладные исследования кооперативного сектора экономики. 2021; (3): 128–35. https://elibrary.ru/aboyiw
- Всероссийский центр изучения общественного мнения (ВЦИОМ). Продукты питания: отечественные или импортные; 2023. Доступно: https://wciom.ru/analytical-reviews/analiticheskii-obzor/produkty-pitanija-otechestvennye-ili-importnye
- Мартышенко Н.С. Маркетинговый анализ потребительского рынка мясной продукции Приморского края. Азимут научных исследований: экономика и управление. 2017; 6(1): 119–22. https://elibrary.ru/yldyod
- Криштафович Д.В., Криштафович В.И. Потребительские предпочтения жителей московского региона при выборе пищевых яиц и яичных продуктов. Птица и птицепродукты. Яичный мир. Информационное приложение. 2023; (5): 63–8. https://doi.org/10.30975/2073-4999-2023-25-5-63-68 https://elibrary.ru/kcbqrq
- Дерканосова Н.М., Василенко О.А., Золотарева Н.И. Изучение потребительских предпочтений в отношении хлебобулочных изделий. Технологии и товароведение сельскохозяйственной продукции. 2016; (1): 5–9. https://elibrary.ru/whdlkv
- ВЭБ.РФ. Индекс качества жизни; 2023. Доступно: https://citylifeindex.ru/
- Газета.Ру. Гендерный вопрос: кто в России ходит за покупками; 2020. Доступно: https://gazeta.ru/business/2020/03/04/12989317.shtml
- AdIndex.ru. Как мужчины и женщины ходили в магазины в 2020 году; 2020. Доступно: https://clck.ru/3GJwsN
- Декич Э. Гендерные стереотипы: контент-анализ рекламы в глянцевых журналах. Век информации. 2018; (2–1): 148–9. https://elibrary.ru/xvxkpz
- Шелунцова Н.Г., Тимофеева В.В., Мажаева Т.В., Козубская В.И., Синицына С.В. Результаты мониторинга качества пищевой продукции в рамках реализации национального проекта «Демография» в Свердловской области. Здоровье населения и среда обитания – ЗНиСО. 2020; (9): 4–9. https://doi.org/10.35627/2219-5238/2020-330-9-4-9 https://elibrary.ru/jumrsj
- Nagyová Ľ., Golian J., Géci A., Palkovič J., Čapla J., Kádeková Z. Food safety from a consumers´ point of view: food quality. Potravinarstvo Slovak Journal of Food Sciences. 2018; 12(1): 355–63. https://doi.org/10.5219/918
- Peri C. The universe of food quality. Food Qual. Prefer. 2006; 17(1–2): 3–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2005.03.002
- Meixner O., Katt F. Assessing the impact of COVID-19 on consumer food safety perceptions – a choice-based willingness to pay study. Sustainability. 2020; 12(18): 7270. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12187270
- Miftari I., Imami D., Kaliji S.A., Canavari M., Gjokaj E. Analyzing consumer perceptions about food safety by applying the food-related lifestyle approach. Ital. J. Food Saf. 2024; 13(1): 11315. https://doi.org/10.4081/ijfs.2024.11315
- Рахмеева И.И. Институциональное доверие в эпоху неопределенности. Актуальные вопросы современной экономики. 2024; (7): 178–83. https://elibrary.ru/bbxqow
- Всероссийский центр изучения общественного мнения (ВЦИОМ). Доверие в России: мониторинг; 2024. Доступно: https://wciom.ru/analytical-reviews/analiticheskii-obzor/doverie-v-rossii-monitoring
- Verdú A., Millán R., Saavedra P., Iruzubieta C.J.C., Sanjuán E. Does the consumer sociodemographic profile influence the perception of aspects related and not related to food safety? A study in traditional Spanish street markets. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2021; 18: 9794. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18189794
- Зарубина Н.Н. Практики питания как маркер и фактор социального неравенства в России: история и современность. Историческая психология и социология истории. 2014; 7(2): 46–62. https://elibrary.ru/tewpib
- Росстат. Потребление продуктов питания в домашних хозяйствах; 2022. Доступно: https://rosstat.gov.ru/compendium/document/13292
- Зайцева Н.В., Алексеев В.Б., Май И.В., Кирьянов Д.А., Земля-нова М.А., Хисматуллин Д.Р. и др. Проблемно-поисковые подходы к оптимизации питания в целях увеличения потенциала ожидаемой продолжительности жизни с учётом биоинформационных сигналов регуляторной системы человека. Гигиена и санитария. 2024; 103(12): 1494–503. https://doi.org/10.47470/0016-9900-2024-103-12-1494-1503 https://elibrary.ru/dmgnfz
- Зайцева Н.В. Анализ рисков для здоровья населения Российской Федерации, обусловленных загрязнением пищевых продуктов. Анализ риска здоровью. 2018; (4): 13–23. https://doi.org/10.21668/health.risk/2018.4.02 https://elibrary.ru/yugrwx
- Петрова Д., Гарция-Ретамеро Р. Эффективное информирование о рисках различных групп потребителей. Анализ риска здоровью. 2018; (4): 114–9. https://doi.org/10.21668/health.risk/2018.4.13 https://elibrary.ru/yugsax
- Baba F.V., Esfandiari Z. Theoretical and practical aspects of risk communication in food safety: A review study. Heliyon. 2023; 9(7): e18141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18141
Supplementary files
