Healthy lifestyle commitment and the workаbility index of industrial employees in the Sverdlovsk Region
- Authors: Mazhaeva T.V.1, Dubenko S.E.1
-
Affiliations:
- Yekaterinburg Medical Research Center for Prophylaxis and Health Protection in Industrial Workers
- Issue: Vol 100, No 12 (2021)
- Pages: 1449-1454
- Section: OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
- Published: 23.12.2021
- URL: https://rjsvd.com/0016-9900/article/view/638745
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.47470/0016-9900-2021-100-12-1449-1454
- ID: 638745
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
Introduction. The gain in the morbidity rate and medical costs associated with the work environment and lifestyle stimulates employers to search for effective preventive measures to preserve health and longevity of workers.
The study aimed to assess commitment to a healthy lifestyle (HLS) and the work ability index of employees of an industrial enterprise and to determine directions for developing effective corporate health promotion programs.
Material and methods. We conducted a questionnaire-based survey of 1188 employees of a large copper smelter to assess their workability and healthy lifestyle commitment.
Results. Two-thirds of the employees rated their quality of life as good; the same proportion of workers was satisfied with the psychological climate and working conditions. More than half of employees were overweight and 64.3% of them did not adhere to a diet in an attempt to lose weight; only 34.4% of the workers reported having regular meals in the works canteen; 51.6% did not engage in physical training and sports, and the share of smokers in the main production workshops was 49.1%. The average workability at the enterprise was assessed as suitable. We established an inverse relationship between chronic diseases and the workability index. A positive rating of the quality of life and working conditions correlated with satisfaction with the working conditions, the profession chosen, the quality of personal protective equipment, and the psychological climate at work.
Discussion. Having a disease significantly affects the workability index, while every tenth worker has a discrepancy between the general health status and job requirements. The employees appreciate their health but fail to change their health-related behaviour, putting other life values above health and undermining it.
Conclusion. Creating comfortable working conditions and motivation for a healthy lifestyle should be differentiated and aimed primarily at workers having a high risk of developing a disease and low motivation and specific behavioural patterns, depending on the initial data obtained. It is necessary to use adapted questionnaires and modern preventive, diagnostic techniques.
Contribution:
Mazhaeva T.V. — the concept and design of the study, writing a text, editing, approval of the final version of the article, responsibility for the integrity of all parts of the article;
Dubenko S.E. — the collection and processing of the material, statistical analysis, writing a text, editing.
Conflict of interest. The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Acknowledgement. The study had no sponsorship.
Received: November 10, 2021 / Accepted: November 25, 2021 / Published: December 30, 2021
About the authors
Tatyana V. Mazhaeva
Yekaterinburg Medical Research Center for Prophylaxis and Health Protection in Industrial Workers
Author for correspondence.
Email: mazhaeva@ymrc.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8566-2446
MD, PhD, Head of the Food Hygiene, Quality and Product Safety Department, Yekaterinburg Medical Research Center for Prophylaxis and Health Protection in Industrial Workers, Yekaterinburg, 620014, Russian Federation.
e-mail: mazhaeva@ymrc.ru
Russian FederationSvetlana E. Dubenko
Yekaterinburg Medical Research Center for Prophylaxis and Health Protection in Industrial Workers
Email: noemail@neicon.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8008-6024
Russian Federation
References
- Yaskin L.A. ISO/DIS 45001.2:2017: Occupational health and safety management systems. Standarty i Kachestvo. 2017; (8): 34–7. (In Russian)
- Wolfenden L., Goldman S., Stacey F.G., et al. Strategies to improve the implementation of workplace‐based policies or practices targeting tobacco, alcohol, diet, physical activity and obesity. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018; 11(11): CD012439. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012439.pub2
- Popovich M.V., Manshina A.V., Kontsevaya A.V., Drapkina O.M. Corporate worker health promotion programs – Review of foreign publications. Profilakticheskaya Meditsina. 2020; 23(3): 156–61. (In Russian) https://doi.org/10.17116/profmed202023031156
- Jones D., Molitor D., Reif J. What do workplace wellness programs do? Evidence from the Illinois Workplace Wellness Study. Q J Econ. 2019; 134(4): 1747–91. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjz023
- Meister J.C., Willyerd K. The 2020 workplace: How innovative companies attract, develop, and keep tomorrow’s employees today. HarperCollins Publishers Inc., 2010.
- Tuomi K., Ilmarinen J., Jahkola A., Katajarinne L., Tulkki A. Work Ability Index. 2nd ed. Helsinki: Finnish Institute of Occupational Health; 1998.
- Mokarami H., Kalteh H.O., Marioryad H. The effect of work-related and socio-demographic factors on Work Ability Index (WAI) among Iranian workers. Work. 2020; 65(1): 137–143. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-193066
- Sorokin G.A., Shilov V.V. Dynamics of indices of workers’ health in different labor intensity. Gigiena i Sanitariya. 2020; 99(6): 618–23. (In Russian) https://doi.org/10.33029/0016-9900-2020-99-6-618-623
- Borghi C., Dormi A., L’Italien G., et al. The relationship between systolic blood pressure and cardiovascular risk—results of the Brisighella Heart Study. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2003; 5(1): 47–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-6175.2003.01222.x
- Cicero A.F., Rosticci M., D’Addato S., et al. Population health needs assessment and healthcare services use in a 3 years follow-up on administrative and clinical data: results from the Brisighella Heart Study. High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev. 2014; 21(1): 45–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40292-013-0033-0
- Biffi A., Fernando F., Adami P.E., et al. Ferrari Corporate Wellness Program: Results of a pilot analysis and the “Drag” impact in the workplace. High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev. 2018; 25(3): 261–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40292-018-0266-z
- Quested E., Ktritz M., Hancox J.E., Ntoumanis N., Thøgersen-Ntoumani C. Promoting self-determined motivation for physical activity: From theory to intervention work. In: Zenko Z, Jones L. (eds.) Essentials of Exercise and Sport Psychology: An Open Access Textbook. 2021: 37–61. https://doi.org/10.51224/B1003
- DeSalvo K.B., Olson R., Casavale K.O. Dietary Guidelines for Americans. JAMA. 2016; 315(5): 457–8. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2015.18396
- Gupta H., Garg S. Obesity and overweight—their impact on individual and corporate health. J Public Health. 2019; 28: 211–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-019-01053-9
- Marteau T.M., Ogilvie D., Roland M., Suhrcke M., Kelly M.P. Judging nudging: can nudging improve population health? BMJ. 2011; 342: d228. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d228
- Geaney F., Kelly C., Di Marrazzo J.S., et al. The effect of complex workplace dietary interventions on employees’ dietary intakes, nutrition knowledge and health status: a cluster controlled trial. Prev Med. 2016; 89: 76–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.05.005
- Aleksandrova E.A., Khabibullina A.R., Aistov A.V., et al. Russian population health-related quality of life indicators calculated using the EQ-5D-3L questionnaire. Sibirskiy Nauchnyy Meditsinskiy Zhurnal. 2020; 40(3): 99–107. (In Russian) https://doi.org/10.15372/SSMJ20200314
- Burke R.J. Creating Psychologically Healthy Workplaces. Cheltenham, United Kingdom: Edward Elgar Publishing; 2019.
- Reif J., Chan D., Jones D., Payne L., Molitor D. Effects of a workplace wellness program on employee health, health beliefs, and medical use: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2020; 180(7): 952–60. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.1321
- Gowrisankaran G., Norberg K., Kymes S., et al. A hospital system’s wellness program linked to health plan enrollment cut hospitalizations but not overall costs. Health Aff (Millwood). 2013; 32(3): 477–85. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2012.0090
- Baxter S., Sanderson K., Venn A.J., Blizzard C.L., Palmer A.J. The relationship between return on investment and quality of study methodology in workplace health promotion programs. Am J Health Promot. 2014; 28(6): 347–63. https://doi.org/10.4278/ajhp.130731-LIT-395
- Mattke S., Schnyer C., Van Busum K.R. A review of the U.S. workplace wellness market. Rand Health Q. 2013; 2(4): 7.
- Pollitz K., Rae M. Workplace wellness programs characteristics and requirements. Kaiser Family Foundation. May 2016. Accessed November 15, 2021. https://files.kff.org/attachment/Issue-Brief-Workplace-Wellness-Programs-Characteristics-and-Requirements
- Song Z., Baicker K. Effect of a workplace wellness program on employee health and economic outcomes: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2019; 321(15): 1491–501. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2019.3307
- Trukhanov A.I., Chudakov S.U. The role of preventive medicine in the social policy of the government. Vestnik Vosstanovitel’noy Meditsiny. 2017; 77(1): 8–17. (In Russian)
- McIntyre A., Bagley N., Frakt A., Carroll A. The dubious empirical and legal foundations of workplace wellness programs. Health Matrix. 2017; 27(1): 59–80. https://repository.law.umich.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2908&context=articles
- Trofimova S.V., Trofimov A.V. Innovative technologies of preventive medicine. Vestnik Vosstanovitel’noy Meditsiny. 2017; 77(1): 37–40. (In Russian)
- Moskalev A.A. Molecular biomarkers of aging for preventive medicine. Vestnik Vosstanovitel’noy Meditsiny. 2017; 77(1): 18–29. (In Russian)
- Piatnytsia-Horpynchenko N.K. Personalized medicine as a basis for occupational diseases prevention. Environment and Health. 2020; (2(95)): 64–70. https://doi.org/10.32402/dovkil2020.02.064
- Akhmetov I., Bubnov R.V. Assessing value of innovative molecular diagnostic tests in the concept of predictive, preventive, and personalized medicine. EPMA J. 2015; 6: 19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13167-015-0041-3
Supplementary files
