Contribution of somatostatin analogues to the implementation of a patient-oriented approach to the treatment of acromegaly


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Acromegaly is a severe disabling disease, the management of which usually requires a multidis-ciplinary treatment approach and lifelong use of medications. The success of long-term drug therapy depends on the effectiveness and safety of the drugs used. The review presents data on modern forms of drug treatment of acromegaly and the mechanisms of action of somatostatin analogues of the 1st generation (SA1) in acromegaly. A comparative analysis of clinical studies concerning the effectiveness and tolerability of prolonged forms of octreotide and lanreotide as primary or secondary drug therapy was performed. Data on patient adherence to long-term SA1 therapy in terms of efficacy, safety, and tolerability of pharmacological drugs are presented. A new form of release of lanreotide Autogel is presented, created with the active participation of patients and medical personnel themselves, and has obvious advantages over injectable forms of octreotide-containing drugs. The most rational schemes of combined treatment in the presence of resistance to SA1 are described, depending on the receptor phenotype and the severity of metabolic disorders. According to clinical studies, there was a great commitment of patients to the use of lanreotide Autogel both as monotherapy and in combination with other drugs.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

E. V Pronin

Endocrinological Dispensary of the Moscow Healthcare Department

Moscow, Russia

Vyacheslav S. Pronin

Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education

Email: vspronin@yandex.ru
Dr. Sci. (Med.) 7, 2nd Botkinsky pr-d, Moscow 125284, Russian Federation

References

  1. Akirov A., Asa S.L., Amer L., et al. The Clinicopathological Spectrum of Acromegaly. J Clin Med. 2019;8(11). doi: 10.3390/jcm8111962.
  2. Cuevas-Ramos D, Carmichael J.D., Cooper O., et al. A structural and functional acromegaly classification. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2015;100(1):122-31. doi: 10.1210/jc.2014-2468.
  3. Varadhan L., Reulen R.C., Brown V, Clayton R.N. The role of cumulative growth hormone exposure in determing mortality and morbidity in acromegaly: a single centre study. Pituitary. 2016;19(3):251-61. doi: 10.1007/s11102-015-0700-3.
  4. Dekkers O.M., Biermasz N.R., Pereira A.M., et al. Mortality in acromegaly: a metaanalysis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008;93:61-7. doi: 10.1210/jc.2007-1191.
  5. Melmed S., Bronstein M.D., Chanson P., et al. A Consensus Statement on acromegaly therapeutic outcomes. Nat Rev Endocrinol, 2018;14(9):552-61. doi: 10.1038/s41574-018-0058-5.
  6. Giustina A., Barkhoudarian G., Beckers A., et al. Multidisciplinary management of acromegaly: A consensus Rev. Endocr Metab Disord Actions. 2020; Sep 10. doi: 10.1007/s11154-020-09588-z.
  7. Bollerslev J, Heck A., Olarescu N.C. Management of endocrine disease: individualised management of acromegaly. Eur J Endocrinol. 2019;181(2):57-71. doi: 10.1530/EJE-19-0124.
  8. Starnoni D., Daniel R.T., Marino L. Surgical treatment of acromegaly according to the 2010 remission criteria: systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Neurochir. (Wien). 2016;158(11):2109-21. doi: 10.1007/s00701-016-2903-4.
  9. Phan K., Xu J., Reddy R. Endoscopic endonasal versus microsurgical transphenoidal approach for growth hormone-secreting pituitary adenomas -systematic review and meta-analysis. Word Neurosurg. 2016;1878-87.
  10. Buch felder M., Feulner J. Neurosurgical Treatment of Acromegaly. Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci. 2016;138:115-39. Doi: 10.1016.
  11. Berg K., Lamberts S.W. Somatostatin analogues in acromegaly and gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours: past, present and future. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2016;23(12):551-66. doi: 10.1530/ERC-16-0151.
  12. Bevan J.S.J. Clinical review: The antitumoral effects of somatostatin analog therapy in acromegaly. Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005;90(3):1856-63. doi: 10.1210/jc.2004-1093.
  13. Gomes-Porras M., Cardenas-Salas J., Alvares-Escola C. Somatostatin Analogs in Clinical Practice: A Review. Int J Mol Sci 2020;21(5):1682. doi: 10.3390/ijms21051682.
  14. Ezzat S., Caspar-Bell G.M., Chik C.L., et al. Predictive markers for postsurgical medical management of acromegaly: a systematic review and consensus treatment guideline. Endocr Pract 2019;25(4):379-93. doi: 10.4158/EP-2018-0500.
  15. Caron P.J. Bevan J.S., Petersenn S., et al. Tumor Shrinkage with lanreotide Autogel 120 mg as primary therapy in acromegaly: results of a prospective multicenter clinical trial. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014;99(4):1282-90. doi: 10.1210/jc.2013-3318.
  16. Caron PJ., Bevan J.S., Petersenn S., et al. Effects of lanreotide Autogel primary therapy on symptoms and quality-of-life in acromegaly: data from the PRIMARYS study. Pituitary. 2016;19(2):149-57. doi: 10.1007/s11102-015-0693-y.
  17. Khairi S., Sagvand B.T., Pulaski-Liebert K.J., et al. Clinical outcomes and self-reported symptoms in patients with acromegaly: an 8-year follow-up of a lanreotide study. Endocr Pract. 2017;23(1):56-65. doi: 10.4158/EP161439.OR.
  18. Salvatory R., Gordon M.B., Woodmansee W.W., et al. A multicenter, observational study of lanreotide depot/autogel (LAN) in patients with acromegaly in the United States: 2-year experience from the SODA registry. Pituitary. 2017;20(6):605-18. doi: 10.1007/s11102-017-0821-y.
  19. Liu W., Xie L.,He M.,et al. Expression of Somatostatin Receptor 2 in Somatotropinoma Correlated with the Short-Term Efficacy of Somatostatin Analogues. Int. J. Endocrinol. 2017;2017:9606985. doi: 10.1155/2017/9606985.
  20. Iglesias P., Magallon R., Mitjavila M., et al. Multimodal therapy in aggressive pituitary tumors. Endocrinol. Diabet Nutr. 2020;67(7):469-85. doi: 10.1016/j.endinu.2019.08.004.
  21. Colao A., Auriemma R.S., Lombardi G., et al. Resistance to somatostatin analogs in acromegaly. Endocr. Rev. 2011;32:247-71. Doi: 10.1210/ er.2010-0002.
  22. Domingo M.P Treatment of acromegaly in the era of personalised and predictive medicine. Clin Endocrinol. (Oxf). 2015;83(1):3-14. doi: 10.1111/cen.12731.
  23. Kasuki L., Wildemberg L.E., Gadelha M.R. Management of endocrine disease: Personalized medicine in the treatment of acromegaly. Eur J Endocrinol. 2018;178(3):89-100. doi: 10.1530/EJE-17-1006.
  24. Melmed S, Cook D., Schopohl J., et al. Rapid and sustained reduction of serum growth hormone and insulin-like growth factor-1 in patients with acromegaly receiving lanreotide Autogel therapy: a randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter study with a 52 week open extension. Pituitary 2010;13(1):18-28. doi: 10.1007/s11102-009-0191-1.
  25. Shimatsu A., Teramoto A., Yizuka N., et al. Efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of sustained-release lanreotide (lanreotide Autogel) in Japanese patients with acromegaly or pituitary gigantism. Endocr J. 2013;60(5):651-63. doi: 10.1507/endocrj.ej12-0417.
  26. Neggers S.J., Pronin V, Balcere I., et al. Lanreotide Autogel 120 mg at extended dosing intervals in patients with acromegaly biochemically controlled with octreotide LAR: the LEAD study. Eur J Endocrinol. 2015;173(3):313-23. doi: 10.1530/ EJE-15-0215.
  27. Witek F.I., Mucha S., Ruchala M. Patient satisfaction and preferences of lanreotide Autogel treatment in acromegaly. Endocrnol Pol. 2016;67(6):572-79. doi: 10.5603/EP2016.0066.
  28. Caron P.J., Petersenn S., Houchard A., et al. Glucose and lipid levels with lanreotide autogel 120 mg in treatment-naïve patients with acromegaly: data from the PRiMARYS study. Clin Endocrinol. (Oxf). 2017;86(4):541-51. doi: 10.1111/cen.13285.
  29. Adelman D.T., et al. Co-Creation of a Lanreotide Autogel/Depot Syringe for the Treatment of Acromegaly and Neuroendocrine Tumours Through Collaborative Human Factor Studies. Adv Ther. 2020;37(2):975-6. doi: 10.1007/s12325-020-01226-z.
  30. Walter M., Eskenazi N., Rama D., et al. Patient and nurse satisfaction with the new lanreotide autogel pre-filled syringe in neuroendocrine tumours (NET): a prospective study (SONATE) Poster H30 Presented at the 17th Annual ENETS conference/11-13 March 2020.
  31. Paragliola R.M., Corsello S.M., Salvatori R. Somatostatin receptor ligands in acromegaly: clinical response and factors predicting resistance. Pituitary. 2017;20(1):109-15. doi: 10.1007/s11102-016-0768-4.
  32. Pisarek H., Pawlikowski M., Kunert-Radek J., Radek M. Expression of somatostatin receptor subtypes in human pituitary adenomas - immunohistochemical studies. Endocrinol Pol. 2009;60(4):240-51.
  33. Corica G., Ceraudo M., Campana C., et al. Octreotide-Resistant Acromegaly: Challenges and Solutions Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2020;16:379-91. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S183360.
  34. Giustina A., Mazziotti G., Cannavo S. HighDose and High-Frequency Lanreotide Autogel in Acromegaly: A Randomized, Multicenter Study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2017;102(7):2454-64. doi: 10.1210/jc.2017-00142.
  35. Puig-Domingo M., Soto A., Venegas E. Use of lanreotide in combination with cabergoline or pegvisomant in patients with acromegaly in the clinical practice: The ACROCOMB study. Endocrinol Nutr. 2016;63(8):397-408. doi: 10.1016/j.endonu.2016.05.010.
  36. Gadelha M.R., Bronsein M.D., Brue T., et al. Pasireotide versus continued treatment with octreotide or lanreotide in patients with inadequately controlled acromegaly (PAOLA): a randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet. Diabet Endocrinol. 2014;2(11):875-84. Doi: 10.1016/ S2213-8587(14)70169-X.
  37. Buchfelder M., van der Lely A.J., Biller B.M.K., et al. Long-term treatment with pegvisomant: observations from 2090 acromegaly patients in ACROSTUDY Eur J Endocrinol. 2018;179(6):419-27. doi: 10.1530/EJE-18-0616.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2020 Bionika Media

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies