Minimum standards of social rights as a condition for a decent standard of living
- 作者: Kolotova N.V.1
-
隶属关系:
- Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences
- 期: 编号 6 (2025)
- 页面: 77-90
- 栏目: Rights and freedoms of a man and a citizen
- URL: https://rjsvd.com/1026-9452/article/view/687369
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/S1026945225060074
- ID: 687369
如何引用文章
详细
Minimum social standards represent thresholds for the observance of social rights that cannot be lowered under any circumstances. Their non-compliance is interpreted as a violation of the constitutional principles of the Welfare State and obligations arising from the human right to a decent standard of living. They express the amount of social rights that can be protected by legal means, and it is in this sense that it is “minimal”. The term “minimum standard” is controversial; There are differences in approaches to this concept in international law and in national States. From the point of view of expressing minimum social standards, the concept of minimum basic obligations, developed by the UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, is considered. The prospects for the development of the concept of minimum standards are related to its application as a legal instrument for establishing State responsibility for violations of social rights, which is used in courts of various countries. The article provides examples from the practice of the Constitutional Court of South Africa, the Federal Constitutional Court of Germany, and the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation, clarifying approaches to minimum social standards in various jurisdictions.
全文:

作者简介
Natalia Kolotova
Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences
编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: kolotova.n@gmail.com
Candidate of Law, Associated Professor, Leading Researcher, Acting Head of the Sector of Human Rights
俄罗斯联邦, 10, Znamenka St., Moscow, 119019参考
- Blankenagel A. Constitutional courts, social rights and the welfare state // Constitutional Law: Eastern European Review. 2003. No. 1 (41). P. 43 (in Russ.).
- Varlamova N. V. Human rights: theoretical justification and legal and dogmatic concretisation. M., 2024. Pp. 258, 259 (in Russ.).
- Varlamova N. V. Social rights: legal and dogmatic interpretation in the practice of constitutional control bodies // Law studies. 2024. Vol. 68. No. 4. Pp. 571, 572 (in Russ.).
- Ivanenko V. A., Ivanenko V. S. Social human rights and social duties of the state: international and constitutional legal aspects. SPb., 2003. P. 108 (in Russ.).
- Kartashkin V. A. Socio-economic rights in times of crisis // Human rights and modern international relations: collection of art. M., 2024. P. 99 (in Russ.).
- Kolotova N. V. Constitutionalization of the concept of “decent standard of living” // Herald of Kutafin University (MSAL). 2024. No. 1 (11). Pp. 152–161 (in Russ.).
- Human rights and the legal welfare state in Russia / ed. by E. A. Lukasheva. M., 2011. P. 24 (in Russ.).
- Putilo N. V. The State minimum social standard // Great Russian Encyclopedia. URL: https://search.app/NxJkydQmLvNoFKcm7 (accessed: 10.04.2025) (in Russ.).
- Putilo N. V. Legal criteria of the welfare state: new approaches // Journal of Russ. law. 2016. No. 10. P. 20 (in Russ.).
- Safoklov Yu. Guarantees of ensuring a living wage as a consequence of the principle of a welfare state: a comparative analysis of the law enforcement practice of the constitutional courts of the Federal Republic of Germany and the Russian Federation // Comparative Constitutional Review. 2010. No. 4 (77). P. 102 (in Russ.).
- Sorokina E. A. Innovative means of protecting socio-economic rights in the practice of the Constitutional Court of South Africa // Law. 2024. No. 12. Pp. 37–48 (in Russ.).
- Tsvart T. Basic social rights: a powerful tool in need of reliable hands // Comparative Constitutional Review. 2007. No. 4 (61). P. 54 (in Russ.).
- Sharlovskiy K. A., Limonova A. M. Constitutional and legal placebo: an analysis of the position of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation in the Decision of September 26, 2024, on the right to drug provision for orphan patients // Comparative Constitutional Review. 2025. Vol. 34. No. 1 (162). Pp. 186, 190 (in Russ.).
- Alston Ph. The Past and Future of Social Rights // Social Rights and the Politics of Obligation in History / eds.: S. Jensen, Ch. Walton. Cambridge University Press, 2022. P. 322.
- Building social protection systems: International standards and human rights instruments. Geneva, 2021.
- Courtney J., Hirschl R., Rosevear E. Economic and Social Rights in National Constitutions // American Journal of Comparative Law. 2014. Vol. 62. Iss. 4. Pp. 1043–1098.
- Creven M. Assessment of the Progress on Adjudication of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights // Road to a Remedy: Current Issues in Litigation of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights / ed. by J. Squires, M. Langford and B. Thiele. Distributed by UNSW Press, 2005. Pp. 39, 40.
- Dugard J. Judging the Judge: Towards an Appropriate Role for Judiciary in South Africa’s Transformation // Leiden Journal of International Law. 2007. Vol. 20. Iss. 4. Pp. 975, 976.
- Fabre S. Social Rights under the Constitution: Government and the Decent Life. Oxford University Press, 2004. Pp. 23, 36, 42.
- Fisher A. Minimum Core and the Right to Education // Research Paper. Commissioned by the Nordic Trust Fund. The World Bank. 2017. Pp. 3, 5.
- Fuller L. L. The Forms and Limits of Adjudication // Harvard Law Review. 1978. Vol. 92. No. 2. P. 353.
- Langford M., Thiele B. Introduction: The Road to a Remedy // Road to a Remedy: Current Issues in Litigation of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights / ed. by J. Squires, M. Langford, B. Thiele. Sydney, 2005. P. 7.
- Lehmann K. In Defense of Constitutional Court: Litigating Socio-Economic Rights and the Myth of Minimum Core // American University International Law Review. 2006. Vol. 22. Iss. 1. P. 185.
- Lucherini F. The Constitutionalization of Social Rights in Italy, Germany, and Portugal: Legislative Discretion, Minimal Guarantees, and Distributive Integration // German Law Journal. 2024. No. 25. Р. 345.
- Moyn S. Not Enough: Human Rights in an Unequal World. Cambridge, 2018. P. 6.
- Shields K. The Minimum Core Obligations of Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights: the Rights to Health and Education // The Nordic Trust Fond. The World Bank. 2017. Pp. 2, 3.
- Scott C., Alston P. Adjudicating Constitutional Priorities in a Transnational Context: a Comment on Soobramoney’s Legacy and Grootboom’s Promise // South African Journal of Human Rights. 2000. Vol. 16. Pp. 206–268.
- Tasioulas J. Minimum Core Obligations: Human Rights in the Here and Now // The Nordic Trust Fond. The World Bank. 2017. P. 10.
- Young K. The Minimum Core of Economic and Social Rights: A Concept in Search of Content // The Yale Journal of International Law. Vol. 33. No. 1. Рp. 113, 116, 120–123.
补充文件
