Vol 43, No 3 (2024)
Articles
От главного редактора
Auxiliary historical disciplines. 2024;43(3):5-6
5-6
From Narva to Danzig: charter of 1590 about the political crisis in Eastern Baltic
Abstract
The article is about political history of Eastern Baltic in 1589–1590 in the context of failed attempt to extend the Plussa truce (1583 and 1585) in late 1589 and first weeks of renewed hostilities. The negotiations planned for the autumn of 1589 on Plussa were disrupted; both sides predictably blamed each other for this. The background for the Russian-Swedish negotiations of 1589 was the Reval Agreements that had just been signed between the Swedish King Johan III and his son, the King of Poland and Grand Duke of Lithuania Sigismund. In January 1590, the war resumed, during which the Moscow army with Tsar Feodor Ivanovich approached the walls of Ivangorod, creating a direct threat to Narva. The source on the theme is published: the letter of Narva inhabitants to Danzig inhabitants about the conversations in late 1589 and the starting of military operations between Russian State and Swedish Kingdom in January, 1590 outlining their vision of the political situation. The charter was discovered at the end of the 19th century by G. W. Forsten in the Danzig archive; today its location cannot be determined. The monument is published according to the edition of G. W. Forsten with Russian translation.
Auxiliary historical disciplines. 2024;43(3):8-22
8-22
Keeper of the Seal and diplomat : The Moscow correspondence of the Dyak of the Posolsky Prikaz (Head of the Foreign Office) V.Ya. Shchelkalov with the Imperial Ambassador Abraham von Donau
Abstract
The article is devoted to the diplomatic protocol and the process of preparing official foreign policy documents of the Moscow State. Among the new sources identified in the Vienna State Archives concerning the diplomatic mission of the imperial ambassador A. von Donau are original letters from Dyak V. Ya. Shchelkalov addressed to the imperial diplomat. The documents allow us to outline the range of topics discussed in Moscow and show that along with foreign policy topics during the negotiations, the parties also treated financial issues concerning private individuals – subjects of the Empire and top officials of the Russian state.
The authors pay special attention to the design of the texts of the Vienna letters: first, for example, the names of the addressee and sender are not disclosed, the address usual for a business or personal document is missing; the second, written on the “Alexandrian sheet”, opens with the “titles” of Tsar Fyodor Ivanovich and Emperor Rudolf II, but they are followed by the names and “titles” of the author of the letter and the addressee of the message. The second letter is sealed with the personal seal of Dyak V. Ya. Shchelkalov. Seal impressions in Russia and other countries are still unknown. The circular inscription contains the name and title of its owner, and in the center of the seal there is a composition of two birds. It is probably an illustration of the parable “On Talkativeness”, which was widespread in medieval Russian literature. The seal is completely unique and characterizes the head of the Russian diplomatic service as a scribe and a high professional in his field.
Auxiliary historical disciplines. 2024;43(3):23-60
23-60
A.V. Predtechensky and St. Petersburg University
Abstract
The article discusses the academic career of the Soviet historian, Anatoliy Predtechensky, from his student days to his position as a professor. When considering the events in the scientist’s life and work, the author employs both biographical and historical-intellectual methods. We examine his period of study at the History and Philology Faculty of St. Petersburg University, from 1911 to 1917. This article presents information from his student record that has not been previously published. Using materials from the Archive of the St. Petersburg Institute of History of the Russian Academy of Sciences, as well as personal documents such as memoirs, we explore Predtechensky's professorial career at Leningrad University, dividing it into three stages: his work in the History department (1933–1954), Philology department (1946– 1961) and Journalism department (1961–1964) of Leningrad University. Some attention is paid to the tragic pages in the history of Soviet higher education, which directly affected the life and career of Anatoliy Predtechensky (the «purges» and «prorabotki» of 1937–1938 and 1948–1949). The reader is invited to a more informal interpretation of the concept of “Predtechensky's school”, which includes not only his official students, but also other scientists who were influenced by his personality and work.
Auxiliary historical disciplines. 2024;43(3):62-84
62-84
A.V. Predtechensky at the beginning of his scientific career
Abstract
The article, based on unpublished sources and sources introduced into scientific discourse for the first time from the Scientific and Historical Archive of the St. Petersburg Institute of History of the Russian Academy of Sciences, the Russian State Archive of Literature and Art and the Central State Archive of St. Petersburg, reconstructs the stages of professional development of the outstanding historian Anatoly Vasilyevich Predtechensky (1893–1966). An appeal to the youthful diary of A. V. Predtechensky, as well as his personal file as a student of the historical and philological faculty of St. Petersburg Uni- versity, made it possible to supplement his biography, emphasizing the spe- cial role in his life in this early period of his cousin, the famous ethnographer S. A. Teploukhov. Apparently, it is precisely the influence of S. A. Teploukhov that can explain A. V. Predtechensky’s departure from revolutionary Petrograd and service in Tomsk at the Institute of Siberian Research until the end of 1920. Upon returning to Petrograd, A. V. Predtechensky actively taught and, previ- ously far from narrowly specialized studies of Russian history, turned to such subjects. The surviving minutes of the meetings of the Section for the Study of the Decembrists and Their Time at the Leningrad Branch of the All-Union Society of Political Prisoners and Exiled Settlers, of which A. V. Predtechensky became a member in January 1927, record the young researcher’s interest in is- sues of economic and socio-political development of Russia at the beginning of the 19th century. Other young researchers, who by the end of the 1920 formed the main circle of contacts and professional connections of A. V. Predtechensky, also turn to these same themes. They were historians of the New Age (gradu- ates of the Petrograd University of the pre-revolutionary and revolutionary era) – V. N. Kashin, A. N. Shebunin, I. M. Trotsky. S. Ya. Gessen became a true friend of A. V. Predtechensky, as evidenced by their sincere correspondence. In creative tandem with him, the historian prepared a number of scientific publi- cations. In the conditions of the 1930s, the close circle of A. V. Predtechensky actually disappeared, but the scientist himself, already having experience in sci- entific work, continued his research practice within the walls of the Leningrad branch of the Institute of History of the USSR Academy of Sciences, strictly relying in his constructions on critically understood information from histori- cal sources, thereby continuing the traditions of pre-revolutionary Petrograd historiography.
Auxiliary historical disciplines. 2024;43(3):85-101
85-101
Works of A.V. Predtechensky on the history of Russian society and socio-political movements of the first third of the 19th century
Abstract
P. V. Ilyin. Works of A. V. Predtechensky on the history of Russian society and socio-political movements in the first third of the 19th century. The article provides an overview of the most important part of the scien- tific heritage of A. V. Predtechensky, devoted to the history of Russian society, socio-political movements and social thought of the 1st third of the 19th cen- tury. Observations on the early works of the historian and scientifically signifi- cant publications of sources prepared in the late 1920s – 1930s, primarily on the history of the Decembrists, are presented. For the first time, a comparison is made of the contents of two monographs – the unpublished book of 1949 «Essays on socio-political thought in Russia at the beginning of the 19th cen- tury» and the famous published work in 1957 «Essays on the socio-political history of Russia in the first quarter of the 19th century». Based on a compari- son of the structural parts of these monographs, the history of the creation of the most important works of the historian is reconstructed, and the genetic rela- tionship between them and the doctoral dissertation defended in 1941 is shown. The materials of the discussion of the book by A. V. Predtechensky in 1957 at the Academic Council of the Leningrad branch of the Institute of History of the USSR Academy of Sciences, stored in the Scientific-Historical archive of the St. Petersburg Institute of History of the Russian Academy of Sciences, are introduced into scientific circulation (reviews by S. N. Valk, N. G. Slad- kevich, B. M. Kochakov), provides information about the unfinished and un- realized works of the researcher. The features of the scientific approaches of A. V. Predtechensky and his methodological guidelines are touched upon, in- cluding the use of manuscripts of unpublished critical reviews by the historian. Based on the observations made, conclusions are proposed about the place and role of A. V. Predtechensky in the Soviet historiography of the social movement and socio-political thought of the 1st half of the 19th century.
Auxiliary historical disciplines. 2024;43(3):102-126
102-126
Materials and documents of Anatoliy V. Predtechensky in the Archive of the St. Petersburg Institute of History of the Russian Academy of Sciences and the St. Petersburg Branch of the Archive of the Russian Academy of sciences
Abstract
Materials and documents of Anatoliy V. Predtechensky in the Archive of the St. Petersburg Institute of History of the Russian Academy of Sciences and the St. Petersburg Branch of the Archive of the Russian Academy of sciences. The article offers a detailed description of the biographical documents and individual parts of the scientific heritage of the historian A. V. Predtechensky (1893–1966), which are deposited in several funds of the Scientific and Historical Archive of the St. Petersburg Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, such as f. 301 (A. V. Pretechensky), f. 193 (A. E. Presnyakov), f. 276 (Publishing Archive of the Leningrad Institute of Historical Sciences). No less valuable evidence of the academic activities of the historian, his participation in large collective projects of the Leningrad Institute of Historical Sciences in the 1930s-1950s, in the procedures of scientific discussions can be extracted from f. 133 of the St. Petersburg Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Based on these materials, the work of A. V. Predtechensky in scientific institutions of Leningrad is traced, including that which, for various reasons, was not reflected in his published works. Of great interest to the historian of Soviet historical science and historiographical life are not only the unpublished scientific works of Predtechensky, but also his dia- ries, unique memories of the musical life of Petrograd-Leningrad, scientific correspondence, materials of university lectures, texts of public speeches. The historian's archive clearly demonstrates the breadth of his creative interests, individual methods of scientific work, and circle of scientific communication. Of most interest for studying the creative laboratory of the historian is the unfinished book about military settlements, materials for which were collected by A. V. Predtechensky in the last years of his life.
Auxiliary historical disciplines. 2024;43(3):127-150
127-150
Signatures of Emperor Maximilian I (1459–1519) in the Archives of the St. Petersburg Institute of History of the Russian Academy of sciences
Abstract
The present study of the signatures of the Holy Roman Emperor Maximilian I (1459–1519) is based on the analysis of authentic charters and official letters preserved the Archive of the St. Petersburg Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Along with the imperial seal, the signatures of the Chancellor, or leading secretaries, as well as the established certification formulas of the chancery, the signature of the will-maker or sender served in the early modern period the most important means of certifying the authenticity of a document issued from the Habsburg Imperial Chancery. According to traditional practice, the predecessors Maximilian as King and later as Emperor did not use the inscription of a personal name as a signature, but a handwritten conventional sign or a verbal certification formula. Having become Duke of Burgundy in 1477, Maximilian of Habsburg, perhaps under the influence of the more advanced Burgundian Chancery tradition, began to use a nominal signature in the form of a proper name with a characteristic long horizontal stroke under it. The collection of the Archive of the St. Petersburg Institute of History contains two letters with rare early examples of this signature. But along with it, the so-called small signature of the emperor – an impersonal phrase per regem per se – is more widespread in Maximilian's documents. Due to the brevity and convenience of writing, the small signature was often imitated by secretaries or stamped with the consent of the monarch. The name of Maximilian I in the Imperial Chancery practice is associated with the transition from the design of a signature in the form of a sign to the writing of a personal name. This transition was inconsistent and was characterized by the coexistence of Maximilian's personal nominal signature and an impersonal sign per regem per se. All subsequent emperors, starting with Charles V, already used signatures in the form of a personal name.
Auxiliary historical disciplines. 2024;43(3):152-173
152-173
Letters of Christina of Sweden to the Apostolic Nuncio to Spain Galeazzo Marescotti on the «Neapolitan sums» (from the collection of the St. Petersburg Institute of History of the Russian Academy of sciences)
Abstract
The publication is a translation and commentary of four letters from the former Queen of Sweden Christina Vasa to the Apostolic Nuncio in Madrid Galeazzo Marescotti in the period 1672–1673, which turned out to be the least documented period in her biography. All four letters are devoted to the topic of the so-called «Neapolitan sums» – loans issued by Bona Sforza, the Dowager Queen of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth, in 1557 to Philip II of Spain. As the second cousin of Jan II Casimir, the former king of Poland, Christina called herself his only legitimate heir and made claims, relying on the support of Cardinal Decio Azzolino Jr., her Roman confidant. The course of the correspondence testifies to the establishment of business relations between the correspondents in the previous period and reflects attempts to rely on the support of Pope Clement X, his nephew, Cardinal Paluzzo Altieri, Secretary of State of the Holy See, and other unnamed influential hierarchs, and dissatisfaction with obstacles that will prove insurmountable in the future. Correspondence from the collection of N. P. Likhachev serves as a documentary confirmation of the assumptions of Polish scientists of the late 19th century about Kristina’s struggle for the «Neapolitan sums».
Auxiliary historical disciplines. 2024;43(3):174-188
174-188
About the Russian translation of Blaise de Vigenère’s «Treatise on Fire and Salt» (1618)
Abstract
The critical article is dedicated to Russian translation of «Treatise on Fire and Salt» (published 1618) by Blaise de Vigenère considered here together with the preface by the translator. The author of the translation neglects comprehensive research of natural philosophical views of Vigenère, in particular, their origin. As a result, the preface does not reveal either the specific features of the author’s views or the nuances of proto-scientific ideas of the modern early period. The impression is also spoiled by the imposition of own political views by the author of the article where, as it seems, more attention should have been paid to the text itself and the figure of its author. The problems of the translation follow from this, for this reason the translation gives the impression of the unelaborated and insensible one. The translator neglects scientific commentary, rarely reads numerous references to other authors, makes no attempt to understand the essence of the chemical experiments described in «Treatise». Such a superficial method of translation entails errors in the interpretation of terms. Due to chosen approach of literally following the text, aggravated by the translator’s shortcomings, the Russian translation does not reveal the heart of alchemical practices of 16th century at all and makes the text difficult to understand not only for a wide range of readers, but even for the scientific community.
Auxiliary historical disciplines. 2024;43(3):190-202
190-202

